Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp3382017pxa; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:16:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxV2HdtVAm62XawWUlkerV/C5VtTT948iTYhHE3JPjZJzIG5AEnbCr/k1g+SKHjhulIGZAK X-Received: by 2002:a50:8f44:: with SMTP id 62mr13881370edy.3.1598415385372; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:16:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598415385; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CY1FA1GP4XSEqSc8Vex7fVENTEVo7Igr3tV5fJPHDNrcD1Oi/BjpIjJk1XpadxGXnH B2zog5ZmCtP9RHQQeGULXXIoIy1V+ajYaz4zh5wlOO/kGLbyelja9T/2llvm7s6j6CZE E+5ash9jFjBxgQLjKf2NHUm14vKWliKceHgDuhAAQ34a/6FTZ715EJysJsqjkkeZHh4r lf1Pna/sUOrdjkEJsu0QLvBM4bNes3h1tWf6VW2nRiZmOWBSL2g9BqTCBaFtjR7xv3H8 0Splagz7LdnYFdy1zOncbiSdDhEXlB7xaWCqqOwuRebQ2v0FV15hncgBRZV/w2S+DgR2 R9uQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=QY6Ljmh2HXSSryC0p9M8nVGRSf9FH/y8FKhduU/dGHc=; b=EixkZ3Dn4z8HwhX6pH39CaGpderCClJNhMfZH+NjgCwQtvApkPknwxKpMi6nPkqTDY FIGkL7fMscQVp9EU06vEAYwD/sVvIHtcghTkqwv4mLvjXGlAcGoc8SbDx60iE12j/G+z x4cyl1isFw46rMr2X+Q4yGBaKvLXyF5Ad01IfNMDxiezLwrRZNTXQV61qOwvlp4hXpb+ qrc9d4KNwBCJ1J2YybT5J4Nf0AbvfQpPdzaxHAWg4hFESjVn4Zs9SpJpBE2yYe/z7QCS 8oYpfWUatqQgCyD/ezEBp9b8aoFBQTkkxHcdZPeu2ohGQAabLocayQjC8+pxtb8qsLiK vLyg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@vanguardiasur-com-ar.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=ukqxvLek; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dg17si709582edb.397.2020.08.25.21.16.01; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:16:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@vanguardiasur-com-ar.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=ukqxvLek; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725267AbgHZEP2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:15:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48386 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725294AbgHZEPZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:15:25 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x644.google.com (mail-ej1-x644.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::644]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13099C061756 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x644.google.com with SMTP id j25so947134ejk.9 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:15:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vanguardiasur-com-ar.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QY6Ljmh2HXSSryC0p9M8nVGRSf9FH/y8FKhduU/dGHc=; b=ukqxvLek6Rh9EePhBgW6aHIfsWaXbpGPJVxjvwjQoc1UpjqQfbRWdjd1Di/NrmBs9V uMMYpdVdmrZnpsAC15Et463umxUcrFLQfwOJYkKs1teWoy3jMgb4WPxOhHY3+Tsx2U7n VAGY5d8iHraduuSrATiE5WN43eDP6GB1aIKH/w+BucM8S4or7eOq9islch5fTcwID0yI /1G/yLDyVue7PGWBzzi5UeWeR6m7L7SqbvERg40QJm01hRvuBHvDdoUtPTeG6enXdcad bLNBFytPl47lj19wukyxMYpcMSCKt1e1X7ZYwraGcNg/FiSFDiA+lrudZdnnVVPwY4ah nV2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QY6Ljmh2HXSSryC0p9M8nVGRSf9FH/y8FKhduU/dGHc=; b=c3+x0J0vSWSVOMCrLH3P8f1IWruG+SHZYrM82W5IVbspfjmB586l7qKS/eEZ7GtIpH uvxYlUyPHoiB7pti7zUaEae/U0O5bHkpipJfdPxEE/5Mxnia6Ly7SdUBFwZJVbd5K1Ow MYnmrRUnvavmHwSWIXoCAsoFjK8r4urQNiDusRbe4qdh2MXGTk89NfjV2OFjAwBS17uV kYXkJhVcSwEX7CPdfLjAKpQCPmT+TXqd6h90NtUNYha9uVh8fvli/QL2yPzfeLIT7k1c ZqJ1m9sdLgq9sFoJgBAniY/85iKflIBRToCbH/iZu/NQ7sDVxEI08pI5Zrmd+w+1Zr54 lIKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kGf/jyuwb7+qZNozTVJ7XzFsMOt0s3VnH5DE9Xn4f+4IyJ1oe vIC/ko43IFAwJr81Kzwz7b4HY84hXK31tyls+UW5Zg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a209:: with SMTP id r9mr14533660ejy.413.1598415323684; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:15:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200825145556.637323-1-gnurou@gmail.com> <20200825145556.637323-3-gnurou@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200825145556.637323-3-gnurou@gmail.com> From: Ezequiel Garcia Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 01:15:12 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: v4l2-mem2mem: simplify poll logic a bit To: Alexandre Courbot Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Hans Verkuil , Nicolas Dufresne , linux-media , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alexandre, On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 11:56, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > Factorize redundant checks into a single code block, remove the early > return, and declare variables in their innermost block. Hopefully this > makes this code a little bit easier to follow. > This _definitely_ makes the poll handling more readable. Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia See below a nitpick. > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot > --- > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c | 35 +++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c > index 0d0192119af20..aeac9707123d0 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c > @@ -841,7 +841,6 @@ static __poll_t v4l2_m2m_poll_for_data(struct file *file, > struct poll_table_struct *wait) > { > struct vb2_queue *src_q, *dst_q; > - struct vb2_buffer *src_vb = NULL, *dst_vb = NULL; > __poll_t rc = 0; > unsigned long flags; > > @@ -863,33 +862,29 @@ static __poll_t v4l2_m2m_poll_for_data(struct file *file, > return EPOLLERR; > > spin_lock_irqsave(&src_q->done_lock, flags); > - if (!list_empty(&src_q->done_list)) > - src_vb = list_first_entry(&src_q->done_list, struct vb2_buffer, > - done_entry); > - if (src_vb && (src_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_DONE > - || src_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR)) > - rc |= EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM; > + if (!list_empty(&src_q->done_list)) { > + struct vb2_buffer *src_vb = list_first_entry( > + &src_q->done_list, struct vb2_buffer, done_entry); > + if (src_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_DONE || > + src_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR) > + rc |= EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM; > + } > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&src_q->done_lock, flags); > > spin_lock_irqsave(&dst_q->done_lock, flags); > - if (list_empty(&dst_q->done_list)) { > + if (!list_empty(&dst_q->done_list)) { > + struct vb2_buffer *dst_vb = list_first_entry( > + &dst_q->done_list, struct vb2_buffer, done_entry); > + if (dst_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_DONE || > + dst_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR) > + rc |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM; > + } else if (dst_q->last_buffer_dequeued) { > /* > * If the last buffer was dequeued from the capture queue, > * return immediately. DQBUF will return -EPIPE. > */ The part about "returning immediately" doesn't make much sense now. Could we rephrase this, keeping the -EPIPE comment? Thanks, Ezequiel > - if (dst_q->last_buffer_dequeued) { > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dst_q->done_lock, flags); > - rc |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM; > - return rc; > - } > - } > - > - if (!list_empty(&dst_q->done_list)) > - dst_vb = list_first_entry(&dst_q->done_list, struct vb2_buffer, > - done_entry); > - if (dst_vb && (dst_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_DONE > - || dst_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR)) > rc |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM; > + } > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dst_q->done_lock, flags); > > return rc; > -- > 2.28.0 >