Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6006:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w6csp157114pxa; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:20:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyw/WAKbcWM+ZKIHrUhWT+F3dqfHqzAtU2RIUrB3ofhgw7rQaQ7JOKZaO9hhHS1xukIUDMO X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2b97:: with SMTP id m23mr10762296ejg.61.1598451610169; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:20:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598451610; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ll1yaWoNsJUUlhtaWJBdIWHdo566rdpdiJqJ9YKcPPN/oP4+TW/DNr2BtL3C0Viyar 5SDO8enJBggfRvZ1JrO6gf62J/xEVdKZd77ip+8APTni0L8jqdmp7MB8S44laC7zBFrz CFXJx7YF3ORFuhPeOnpqZucMx57QNJfOQpfC17Ocx5Z2uHbFd2opZtfnHYo0Rzd+GEXR 5swbKmDHagN5ZOHpf2ZOUWWcN7KAZkvEbUAlR/XBxFcC8/2YbPgpD4zS9UjkICfAxIVB PIIyRKSPJmH7XQRy4VdVKuWYkKlAp6piBFywa14n/w+auX9v4vzr40c+vRn5u6gnCfkx l6sA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=aU6SzC4HPKAdpsfd1/EKwFJCt0CfheymGe5/PRIykis=; b=Olr94ViuPXIRbd3gHzFjlod8yvM7P7ZJ2dEYRUJwvpRAYEPL81RwgI5UW5BneQWPAx P/mJU6yZ7FcYOBaSoa0HRzL/zuzGNq3Bs0zwpOv/Ff45O5lMzXnExeZyuMRDt830qC++ VX3ltBz3XBW6W0F7UsHswWVFwqXZLphD7c1I7HFHhHitbB2qpyKit15yc+tL3eTAfnXu rRPMyOXoDu5VqYYlB7JRqZ9R5wUVqRX0gA44OEvNF1LIgL7uIA60hnLRnLmC57VjVzgD HtGyHwALw0jixhSu8ZG4+qhn6jJLMzNGPoyWrnsl/ns867+s54myB5CF9U27Hq1Xm1eP fcaQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kLkk6P2r; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id yc29si1563929ejb.674.2020.08.26.07.19.46; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kLkk6P2r; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728545AbgHZKBq (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 06:01:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45216 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728400AbgHZKBp (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 06:01:45 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x244.google.com (mail-oi1-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::244]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A40E0C061574; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 03:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x244.google.com with SMTP id n128so1034038oif.0; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 03:01:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aU6SzC4HPKAdpsfd1/EKwFJCt0CfheymGe5/PRIykis=; b=kLkk6P2rg8BhuVDfo6yGiUK2wsxe4gSq3InBYsZSplXAV7lOxYYp1J3Q5DPL1Atuio wzsMCRLELwnf36uijOPxK5cp7rbI3xFBGVt/1xNk5NI1EEpw2+MFPYKkn0DV+bQnL8jS gByBV5G13T1sJJOtdkimgb3sWtgAKnqVtVqsjuz/8P0ot8gu3lO55v3Zz1BAI0voo4sC BgZLRZ6Zevw4I5LCGST2ULe4UDW0ldYsDc/Vfwdr18TYV92+8x24tYclqB9sPTYDWngS viVa9iCihofF9hXA0iHyWvHUPhFmgqY2F+y3lBMzCc0HVroFxSCvo5yUYKJIvlimNnYU 9Rsw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aU6SzC4HPKAdpsfd1/EKwFJCt0CfheymGe5/PRIykis=; b=JvyZanwJiIap6wmAlKUF0jWRXR6RVuoNz7p2pmi4lgOJaYHakw0Vea/c5F/60R0190 i1sZPDLL0Cv2SQiaBNyLB5edqJj2zVdhDe+Zqb9Fi1wNEQclbjkFoxnyVTWW28csMuDJ VJyBRAT5I3oSQLUgQ3WQhnRwm9iDmKADhPY08fycPwRx37/QlFWAcL4En30mP5mAvakf 8UGGINV2iz/vgptcTF0dhwgrM6YptlKJgH0MCkh/SfT8NhUJNSh+l2oJnUGra12lEFsy 5sWYUhoQAhSz5gYbq2DwPavInGfEEldKw3o0pfGtwal07jrA+UqRQs730MkebJ6yX9K/ rSwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533JVxuUePS3lWiXIPcIhNfDiePUxtCgusH9EsQ5Ra2G57UTnFoG wJzJaP6D7EmYnGOjyrVjEzGrnQJUKAEQ0bQxtCY= X-Received: by 2002:aca:304b:: with SMTP id w72mr3257414oiw.117.1598436105035; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 03:01:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200826063850.47625-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> <1c32f6b5-deb6-e310-4bc4-a871719cc8f3@st.com> In-Reply-To: <1c32f6b5-deb6-e310-4bc4-a871719cc8f3@st.com> From: Alexandru Ardelean Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 13:01:33 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: stm32-dac: Replace indio_dev->mlock with own device lock To: Fabrice Gasnier Cc: Alexandru Ardelean , linux-iio , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, LKML , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jonathan Cameron , alexandre.torgue@st.com, Sergiu Cuciurean Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:01 PM Fabrice Gasnier wrote: > > On 8/26/20 8:38 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > > From: Sergiu Cuciurean > > > > As part of the general cleanup of indio_dev->mlock, this change replaces > > it with a local lock on the device's state structure. > > > > The patch also does a minor whitespace change to align the 'lock' with the > > 'common' field via tabs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergiu Cuciurean > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean > > --- > > drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c | 14 +++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c b/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c > > index 092c796fa3d9..fc636812c17e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c > > +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c > > @@ -26,9 +26,11 @@ > > /** > > * struct stm32_dac - private data of DAC driver > > * @common: reference to DAC common data > > + * @lock: lock to protect the data buffer during regmap ops > > Hi Alexandru, > > I think the same patch has been sent by Sergiu already [1]. > Jonathan and I had a minor comment at that time: E.g. could you please > update the comment ? Oh. My bad. I didn't follow the discussion closely. Will send a V2. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/18/254 > > > */ > > struct stm32_dac { > > - struct stm32_dac_common *common; > > + struct stm32_dac_common *common; > > Is above change needed? No. I can remove it. Thanks Alex > > Best Regards, > Fabrice > > > + struct mutex lock; > > }; > > > > static int stm32_dac_is_enabled(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int channel) > > @@ -58,10 +60,10 @@ static int stm32_dac_set_enable_state(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int ch, > > int ret; > > > > /* already enabled / disabled ? */ > > - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock); > > + mutex_lock(&dac->lock); > > ret = stm32_dac_is_enabled(indio_dev, ch); > > if (ret < 0 || enable == !!ret) { > > - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock); > > + mutex_unlock(&dac->lock); > > return ret < 0 ? ret : 0; > > } > > > > @@ -69,13 +71,13 @@ static int stm32_dac_set_enable_state(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int ch, > > ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); > > if (ret < 0) { > > pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); > > - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock); > > + mutex_unlock(&dac->lock); > > return ret; > > } > > } > > > > ret = regmap_update_bits(dac->common->regmap, STM32_DAC_CR, msk, en); > > - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock); > > + mutex_unlock(&dac->lock); > > if (ret < 0) { > > dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "%s failed\n", en ? > > "Enable" : "Disable"); > > @@ -327,6 +329,8 @@ static int stm32_dac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > indio_dev->info = &stm32_dac_iio_info; > > indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE; > > > > + mutex_init(&dac->lock); > > + > > ret = stm32_dac_chan_of_init(indio_dev); > > if (ret < 0) > > return ret; > >