Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200825145556.637323-1-gnurou@gmail.com> <20200825145556.637323-3-gnurou@gmail.com>
 <CAAEAJfD1kUJODa+-STV6Q+=9qWH8v2=KZzAA4ppgfbQxstO+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAEAJfD1kUJODa+-STV6Q+=9qWH8v2=KZzAA4ppgfbQxstO+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 20:19:33 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAVeFuJgBqN7KYhNi=mMNxy6wHTZOn5E1=pHP3q=n8X++b5pmg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: v4l2-mem2mem: simplify poll logic a bit
To:     Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
        Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com>,
        linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Ezequiel, thanks for the review!

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 1:15 PM Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 11:56, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Factorize redundant checks into a single code block, remove the early
> > return, and declare variables in their innermost block. Hopefully this
> > makes this code a little bit easier to follow.
> >
>
> This _definitely_ makes the poll handling more readable.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
>
> See below a nitpick.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c | 35 +++++++++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c
> > index 0d0192119af20..aeac9707123d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c
> > @@ -841,7 +841,6 @@ static __poll_t v4l2_m2m_poll_for_data(struct file *file,
> >                                        struct poll_table_struct *wait)
> >  {
> >         struct vb2_queue *src_q, *dst_q;
> > -       struct vb2_buffer *src_vb = NULL, *dst_vb = NULL;
> >         __poll_t rc = 0;
> >         unsigned long flags;
> >
> > @@ -863,33 +862,29 @@ static __poll_t v4l2_m2m_poll_for_data(struct file *file,
> >                 return EPOLLERR;
> >
> >         spin_lock_irqsave(&src_q->done_lock, flags);
> > -       if (!list_empty(&src_q->done_list))
> > -               src_vb = list_first_entry(&src_q->done_list, struct vb2_buffer,
> > -                                               done_entry);
> > -       if (src_vb && (src_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_DONE
> > -                       || src_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR))
> > -               rc |= EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM;
> > +       if (!list_empty(&src_q->done_list)) {
> > +               struct vb2_buffer *src_vb = list_first_entry(
> > +                       &src_q->done_list, struct vb2_buffer, done_entry);
> > +               if (src_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_DONE ||
> > +                   src_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR)
> > +                       rc |= EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM;
> > +       }
> >         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&src_q->done_lock, flags);
> >
> >         spin_lock_irqsave(&dst_q->done_lock, flags);
> > -       if (list_empty(&dst_q->done_list)) {
> > +       if (!list_empty(&dst_q->done_list)) {
> > +               struct vb2_buffer *dst_vb = list_first_entry(
> > +                       &dst_q->done_list, struct vb2_buffer, done_entry);
> > +               if (dst_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_DONE ||
> > +                   dst_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR)
> > +                       rc |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
> > +       } else if (dst_q->last_buffer_dequeued) {
> >                 /*
> >                  * If the last buffer was dequeued from the capture queue,
> >                  * return immediately. DQBUF will return -EPIPE.
> >                  */
>
> The part about "returning immediately" doesn't make
> much sense now. Could we rephrase this, keeping the -EPIPE
> comment?

I understood this sentence as referring to the system call and not
just this function, but maybe we can rephrase this as "... make
user-space wake up immediately"?

>
> Thanks,
> Ezequiel
>
> > -               if (dst_q->last_buffer_dequeued) {
> > -                       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dst_q->done_lock, flags);
> > -                       rc |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
> > -                       return rc;
> > -               }
> > -       }
> > -
> > -       if (!list_empty(&dst_q->done_list))
> > -               dst_vb = list_first_entry(&dst_q->done_list, struct vb2_buffer,
> > -                                               done_entry);
> > -       if (dst_vb && (dst_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_DONE
> > -                       || dst_vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR))
> >                 rc |= EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
> > +       }
> >         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dst_q->done_lock, flags);
> >
> >         return rc;
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >