Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6006:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w6csp261656pxa; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:54:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWSBYLFqUlXLS26LJQyj4Y3UsguiRjJSA13J2Y3Pgynw4W5T9ZBfBN+1AYt8GWGXE4wJwb X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c1c3:: with SMTP id bw3mr17480801ejb.8.1598460849779; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:54:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598460849; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ykP+rlpcZrqfijmBEeFDlP5SoeEiTglmuJ1T0LhRtlMtFN/Qe08sheUEvPEfmnwoMP FCCIvObrWaYyBhDe6B1y0svPPUM0Pg6OU0gANS/DTMhQviEM+kdO2EV1GDCXSm0bbfIN nXsMz9pgn5SfnSYlttGmhxzJ8Q/Nyc3czwBPe2od3pgKss0JY5vfN5Eg6GlyLdpmFQfg CJobrUVjk4wa6C4XLyh3/t3IfZAR/pV/aFGoEpfA8zbCW33deBCa796tCZ6+FL5jBcgJ z/j8nNuR8FHy5JkbBKiZ7ao/xYtt/6DNHkGF4WMuqVjS4z+XPOpA/5dl7MrgehgJopmG Un6A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=WGmYSPgQpjS3eQZ1Vl3miEBud2jA2YMb9L/cYORpZ2k=; b=bRr4JWZs4R0jh9ZMWdmdDbZVtmJ6DcV99YxzeEUQLxVbgUzhNxEW/oSlDeZmIMEqgY qyBHhPmmuFnR2xiLQKY8WwD1B64NY54eso7myjr/dbvM+R6zlV29oia/lw+3Uj6mZRGw JzdHQnmYg8fxl9dL73hj3nkOMTT40vFAltzEdg271i3Q/A3stMTqEyatrVJdl0PZKbIF V0QKNohaKLJf0IRWlg36I4gOAQP/opEOfwsQMStIhn9+jfkH6v8KV9CLXNVUFiFy878c LribAuHJbCMlwWfII7KCKosSIE5I85mlClMaiOiEmwtfFFH9emIfoVjlOtp4OeKvqU/n R8iA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l7si2030987edv.354.2020.08.26.09.53.46; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:54:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728116AbgHZQuh (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:50:37 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:23604 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727943AbgHZQuc (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:50:32 -0400 IronPort-SDR: AeYTCsvcaJ87PfmSNpVKnB4e3+jgzy6QvAK5BVxuG54B/iADXRjtzyHk/GZb8/3S3RKe99SHPU LFokhlMa2pbQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9725"; a="144004299" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,356,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="144004299" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Aug 2020 09:50:30 -0700 IronPort-SDR: O+tRoc/59eCGpVLJON72igRMmtjnFMq9wo28apgxlygz1/37A+zdeFZDDyibhT3bW+C7JSBdFz MbToSWPlnzpg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,356,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="444115517" Received: from orsmsx606-2.jf.intel.com (HELO ORSMSX606.amr.corp.intel.com) ([10.22.229.86]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2020 09:50:30 -0700 Received: from orsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.19) by ORSMSX606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:50:30 -0700 Received: from orsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.128) by orsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:50:30 -0700 Received: from [10.212.160.45] (10.212.160.45) by ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:50:29 -0700 Subject: Re: [patch V2 15/46] x86/irq: Consolidate DMAR irq allocation To: Thomas Gleixner , LKML CC: , Joerg Roedel , , , "Haiyang Zhang" , Jon Derrick , Lu Baolu , Wei Liu , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Stephen Hemminger , Steve Wahl , Dimitri Sivanich , "Russ Anderson" , , Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , , Juergen Gross , "Boris Ostrovsky" , Stefano Stabellini , Marc Zyngier , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jason Gunthorpe , Dave Jiang , Alex Williamson , Jacob Pan , Baolu Lu , Kevin Tian , Dan Williams References: <20200826111628.794979401@linutronix.de> <20200826112332.163462706@linutronix.de> From: "Dey, Megha" Message-ID: <812d9647-ad2e-95e9-aa99-b54ff7ebc52d@intel.com> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:50:27 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200826112332.163462706@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.212.160.45] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Thomas, On 8/26/2020 4:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > From: Thomas Gleixner > > None of the DMAR specific fields are required. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 6 ------ > arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c | 10 +++++----- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h > @@ -83,12 +83,6 @@ struct irq_alloc_info { > irq_hw_number_t msi_hwirq; > }; > #endif > -#ifdef CONFIG_DMAR_TABLE > - struct { > - int dmar_id; > - void *dmar_data; > - }; > -#endif > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_UV > struct { > int uv_limit; > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c > @@ -329,15 +329,15 @@ static struct irq_chip dmar_msi_controll > static irq_hw_number_t dmar_msi_get_hwirq(struct msi_domain_info *info, > msi_alloc_info_t *arg) > { > - return arg->dmar_id; > + return arg->hwirq; Shouldn't this return the arg->devid which gets set in dmar_alloc_hwirq? -Megha > } > > static int dmar_msi_init(struct irq_domain *domain, > struct msi_domain_info *info, unsigned int virq, > irq_hw_number_t hwirq, msi_alloc_info_t *arg) > { > - irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq, arg->dmar_id, info->chip, NULL, > - handle_edge_irq, arg->dmar_data, "edge"); > + irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq, arg->devid, info->chip, NULL, > + handle_edge_irq, arg->data, "edge"); > > return 0; > } > @@ -384,8 +384,8 @@ int dmar_alloc_hwirq(int id, int node, v > > init_irq_alloc_info(&info, NULL); > info.type = X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_DMAR; > - info.dmar_id = id; > - info.dmar_data = arg; > + info.devid = id; > + info.data = arg; > > return irq_domain_alloc_irqs(domain, 1, node, &info); > } > >