Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:36:03 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc:     Kuldip Dwivedi <kuldip.dwivedi@puresoftware.com>,
        Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@nxp.com>, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@nxp.com>,
        Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@nxp.com>,
        Tanveer Alam <tanveer.alam@puresoftware.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Add ACPI support
Message-ID: <20200826183603.GP4965@sirena.org.uk>
References: <c810740d75f64e308fd362e6c6a5f437@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200822152118.rlwbcgfk4abjldtg@skbuf>
 <VE1PR04MB6768699B6D7A507A5BF82F9191540@VE1PR04MB6768.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <20200826114758.4agph53ag2fin6um@skbuf>
 <20200826142312.GH4965@sirena.org.uk>
 <20200826144744.c4yzgoovk6f4t3id@skbuf>
 <2e19f8979be4f962045a1597bdbe7886@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200826160950.i3k2oy6w2dlvmj34@skbuf>
 <20200826170205.GL4965@sirena.org.uk>
 <20200826183044.4g6jvfrgkhpxki3k@skbuf>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/DkgDsqJFFamjKX0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200826183044.4g6jvfrgkhpxki3k@skbuf>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--/DkgDsqJFFamjKX0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 09:30:44PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:02:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > That's not something that it's particularly idiomatic to actually use in
> > ACPI and you end up with the same namespacing problem assigning IDs so
> > I'm not sure it makes life any better.

> So what's the idiomatic thing to do in this case, allocate the first
> free PNP ID now for DSPI controller on LS2085A, then another one for
> DSPI on LX2160A later, etc etc?

AFAICT yes, assuming you don't make it look like a PCI device and
enumerate that way which is more how these things more normally end up
getting done.

--/DkgDsqJFFamjKX0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl9Gq5MACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9C6twf+PyPo8Vp/efexBeGZf6oJ4vE+zGVxxKbzWoPyzKTy2VlBDNQU7Oqd0r6+
EZhJ1MRWMI9S2+IGprqddt8oc8IFgQpiFe+NOZf69AieZU5bTvhLRdCxSglm+7Zv
ZvIjIZbYW9wV/MiUQCOADvdAdkETDr1U9NNJVpNG+1EGd/2Tt6NUBxdPcc/OKXFI
p8bCtzZ/04cEaPZMuvm3IP7V6TgeTngxN1Z4bFtVKnPnlwAvW0fDTCvKlRCUrhSn
3iWtim8aC8rdSju4yuT4djzX3VFl0xBrOsKMNQhLoTwYV8+uvtOnpiqmE5D685Gb
Q6JLO1s9uXGKVgo0n4GWn8iIJS1dbQ==
=R2TH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/DkgDsqJFFamjKX0--