Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] rpmsg: virtio: use rpmsg_ns driver to manage ns
 announcement
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
CC:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
        "linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" 
        <linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>
References: <20200731114732.12815-1-arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
 <20200731114732.12815-9-arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
 <20200825165433.GA4141387@xps15>
 <c1b81b38-c155-3183-ed67-822c4f87ec71@st.com>
 <20200826221030.GB4141387@xps15>
From:   Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
Message-ID: <c6dc8282-7c84-730b-2946-378078b1e514@st.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Aug 2020 09:03:04 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200826221030.GB4141387@xps15>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 8/27/20 12:10 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> I had another very long look at this...  I haven't had the time to look in your
> next serie so the end result is not yet clear in my head.  But...
> 
> In __rpmsg_create_channel() the new code is testing for VIRTIO_RPMSG_F_NS in
> order to allocate the ops, which means that the rpdev that is fed to
> virtio_rpmsg_announce_create/destroy() are associated with a virtproc_info.
> Moreover there is a test in virtio_rpmsg_announce_create/destroy() that checks 
> for VIRTIO_RPMSG_F_NS already.  So if the rpdev was created from another
> interface than the name announcement then no message would be sent.  
> 
> So it seems to me that the last two patches could be dropped and things would
> still work properly.

Yes the last 2 patches concerns the TX part. Drop them could also be an option.
  
> 
> The good news is that I reviewed V2 today and things look good.  I will wait to
> review your next set before adding RB tags.  The down side is that having spent
> a fair amount of time on your set, I need to look at other people's work if I
> want to be fair to everyone.  As such I have to push back the review of your
> other set to next week.

That's fair! And this will give me time to have a look to the detach series. 

Thanks,
Arnaud

> 
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>