Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:29:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:29:32 -0500 Received: from ix.esoft.com ([199.45.143.3]:44293 "EHLO esoft.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:28:37 -0500 Message-ID: <3BDDE642.8000901@acm.org> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:29:06 -0700 From: Jonathan Briggs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011012 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux kernel Subject: Re: Nasty suprise with uptime In-Reply-To: <3BDDBE89.397E42C0@lexus.com> <20011029124753.F21285@one-eyed-alien.net> <4.3.2.7.2.20011029172525.00bb2270@mail.osagesoftware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org A 32 bit uptime patch should also include a new kernel parameter that could be passed from LILO: uptime. Then you could test the uptime patch by passing uptime=4294967295 Or make /proc/uptime writable. David Relson wrote: > Let's assume you have the counter changed to 32 bits - RIGHT NOW > (tm). Build a kernel, install it, reboot. It'll be over a year > (approx Jan 2003) before the change will be noticeable... > > Methinks that's a long time to wait for a result :-) > > David > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/