Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6006:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w6csp1008286pxa; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 00:38:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNrYlJkPcik9y31dLWhlWvX9s218ecQrShv+PPVjjDlEk2EjHiVi/yXOdAx4PzurmlATTb X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d697:: with SMTP id d23mr555207edr.13.1598600300670; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 00:38:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598600300; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hCVIqyluEOmG3E29zkRuGDxCLtCnyhtuEncNkpGdvCzhJkSHnVz6pZ0/PZf08aR9MY 2n6RppLsb4Phxv/oqpL45Pt7TdFAd3azSiUSNFsYQk6pH7q4usmLUf6be1WPXWdSmpQT sj8x7bHsQBajzvxmMXARN7CYrPMrsQojU17onrSG+2gxLg1lYxSixbqFZNxeVVNA0ojh 0jMByJ0vu0Bk2OyEwZ2LJPFadmP3F7Jt6M9Rj9yrPVSeIsW6ZAe64BrDkipWKrZB/TPh vGOVg5/xLo2IGn0FvQ0OSTLZPFUSvF6TdQQ7B2VtWUaa2C2MfruHLf0/m8KSgSz8hMRp a6Yw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=FdeTexF+KaZVcnnQqQmvvi1OARcLvr58dEcK+UhiI2c=; b=jHX7IRJjkZA5BPJy0hgBtggNH51Yv0ZIaL7fKMedHMb8Hlryp7eMJcg5+730PihlU5 IJBEFz8hRDg+EX9X8kug5Da/F5u+lUPv1QqR26upiMZohot5Fl0jAIRmwt90Ao/niLQ6 yzSjnsbSjnfGqRvVi/M8jB5+027gCE18bK9jXOYNnbcQLlvtEDnFzB0SJQRC8Efj8s6J rP42CZsP7FJaCipivUh6i1hLDfHAML8VNe1R3TZBB+gV/wrB3MQPsvljF7H655IDEHnn 3qmWqKkXE9zxm6E2SVS0s6dNlyTaZqONPu6lNvWduRzxOXMUszECIGUp5PdTGqh4XsDJ EHEQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=monom.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d20si119913ejz.445.2020.08.28.00.37.58; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 00:38:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=monom.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728379AbgH1Hgy (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 03:36:54 -0400 Received: from mail.monom.org ([188.138.9.77]:53924 "EHLO mail.monom.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726500AbgH1Hgx (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 03:36:53 -0400 Received: from mail.monom.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filter.mynetwork.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0104050035A; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:36:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.monom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from localhost (unknown [94.31.100.251]) by mail.monom.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFF2250019C; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:36:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:36:50 +0200 From: Daniel Wagner To: Daniel Vacek Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , linux-rt-users , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.9-rc2-rt1 Message-ID: <20200828073650.kq4qaon2u4xsqqlr@beryllium.lan> References: <20200826081211.bvk5kfuzh4vlbh5k@linutronix.de> <20200826090518.m6vblobggnfdjau5@beryllium.lan> <20200826104326.xfexkwovwbi2q4el@beryllium.lan> <20200827091910.ibuyr53qprb7qmju@beryllium.lan> <20200827092743.kjl6hkaephx3a64a@linutronix.de> <20200827101622.xx4jzecouxrlwbii@beryllium.lan> <20200827102840.msv556nrah4h4vmq@linutronix.de> <20200827112705.uleixtdmx3pacr5u@beryllium.lan> <20200827124611.tsivo4xopvoenfmy@beryllium.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 05:50:24PM +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote: > Maybe the threshold is 33554432, eg. 32 megs... I've rearranged the load addresses for the kernel and the dtb and now the board is booting again. Starting with a full test run now. The size list was mainly to see if the v5.9 tree is showing abnormal size regression. It doesn't look that's the case. All RT kernels are bigger than the rest.