Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:10:04 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To:     Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Cc:     broonie@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
        ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com, patches@opensource.cirrus.com,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        m.szyprowski@samsung.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: wm8994: Ensure the device is resumed in
 wm89xx_mic_detect functions
Message-ID: <20200828091004.GA17786@pi3>
References: <20200827173357.31891-1-s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
 <CGME20200827173426eucas1p13f9f7d358dfcc440db160de3dc658ddf@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
 <20200827173357.31891-2-s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
 <20200828064812.GE17406@pi3>
 <28723053-c305-d359-3862-656ade11bf74@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <28723053-c305-d359-3862-656ade11bf74@samsung.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:50:33AM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 28.08.2020 08:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c
> >> index b3ba053..fc9ea19 100644
> >> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c
> >> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c
> >> @@ -3514,6 +3514,8 @@ int wm8994_mic_detect(struct snd_soc_component *component, struct snd_soc_jack *
> >>  		return -EINVAL;
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(component->dev);
> 
> > The driver enables PM runtime unconditionally so you should probably
> > handle the error code here. I know that driver does not do it in other
> > cases but it should not be a reason to multiple this pattern... unless
> > it really does not matter as there are no runtime PM ops?
> 
> The regmap is provided by the parent MFD device (drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c)
> and that is where those runtime PM calls get propagated, we could possibly
> get en error if there is something wrong with resuming the parent device.
> 
> If you don't mind I would prefer to omit the return value tests in that
> fix patch. Existing callers of the wm89*_mic_detect() functions are 
> ignoring the return value anyway. Probably the checks could be added 
> in a separate patch. 

I don't mind.

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof