Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965057AbWEYG4o (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2006 02:56:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965055AbWEYG4o (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2006 02:56:44 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:26269 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965054AbWEYG4n (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2006 02:56:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:22:20 +0530 From: Balbir Singh To: David Chinner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Per-superblock unused dentry LRU lists V2 Message-ID: <20060525065219.GD25185@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@in.ibm.com References: <20060524110001.GU1331387@melbourne.sgi.com> <20060525040604.GB25185@in.ibm.com> <20060525061553.GC8069029@melbourne.sgi.com> <20060525063350.GD8069029@melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20060525063350.GD8069029@melbourne.sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4644 Lines: 76 On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:33:50PM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:15:53PM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > > On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 09:36:04AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > > > +/* > > > > + * Shrink the dentry LRU on æ given superblock. > > > ^^^ > > > This character (ae) looks strange. > > > > Fixed. It slipped through when I switched to the -mm tree. > > > > > The other changes look fine. Do you have any performance numbers, any > > > results from stress tests (for version 2 of the patch)? > > > > Not yet - I've just started the stress tests now. I had to wait for > > the storage and then reconfigure it which took some time. It's > > currently running a create/unlink workload across 8 filesystems in > > parallel. I'll run some dbench loads after this has run for a few > > hours. > > > > FWIW, this create/unlink load has been triggering reliable "Busy > > inodes after unmount" errors that I've slowly been tracking down. > > After I fixed the last problem in XFS late last week, I've > > been getting a failure that i think is the unmount/prune_dcache > > races that you and Neil have recently fixed. > > I just had all 8 filesystems come up with: > > May 25 15:55:18 budgie kernel: XFS unmount got error 16 > May 25 15:55:18 budgie kernel: xfs_fs_put_super: vfsp/0xe00000b006339280 left dangling! > May 25 15:55:18 budgie kernel: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of dm-9. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... > May 25 15:55:19 budgie kernel: XFS: Invalid device [/dev/mapper/dm8], error=-16 > May 25 15:55:35 budgie kernel: XFS unmount got error 16 > May 25 15:55:35 budgie kernel: xfs_fs_put_super: vfsp/0xe000003015a18c80 left dangling! > May 25 15:55:35 budgie kernel: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of dm-15. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... > May 25 15:55:35 budgie kernel: XFS unmount got error 16 > May 25 15:55:35 budgie kernel: xfs_fs_put_super: vfsp/0xe000003015ea6280 left dangling! > May 25 15:55:35 budgie kernel: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of dm-13. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... > May 25 15:55:36 budgie kernel: XFS: Invalid device [/dev/mapper/dm14], error=-16 > May 25 15:55:36 budgie kernel: XFS: Invalid device [/dev/mapper/dm12], error=-16 > May 25 15:55:42 budgie kernel: XFS unmount got error 16 > May 25 15:55:42 budgie kernel: xfs_fs_put_super: vfsp/0xe00000b00633b580 left dangling! > May 25 15:55:42 budgie kernel: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of dm-5. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... > May 25 15:55:44 budgie kernel: XFS: Invalid device [/dev/mapper/dm4], error=-16 > May 25 15:55:44 budgie kernel: XFS unmount got error 16 > May 25 15:55:44 budgie kernel: xfs_fs_put_super: vfsp/0xe00000b00633bc80 left dangling! > May 25 15:55:44 budgie kernel: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of dm-11. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... > May 25 15:55:44 budgie kernel: XFS: Invalid device [/dev/mapper/dm10], error=-16 > May 25 15:55:55 budgie kernel: XFS unmount got error 16 > May 25 15:55:55 budgie kernel: xfs_fs_put_super: vfsp/0xe000003015d4a080 left dangling! > May 25 15:55:55 budgie kernel: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of dm-7. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... > May 25 15:55:56 budgie kernel: XFS: Invalid device [/dev/mapper/dm6], error=-16 > May 25 15:56:16 budgie kernel: XFS unmount got error 16 > May 25 15:56:16 budgie kernel: xfs_fs_put_super: vfsp/0xe00000b9edeacf80 left dangling! > May 25 15:56:16 budgie kernel: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of dm-3. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... > May 25 15:56:16 budgie kernel: XFS unmount got error 16 > May 25 15:56:16 budgie kernel: xfs_fs_put_super: vfsp/0xe000003015a2a280 left dangling! > May 25 15:56:16 budgie kernel: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of dm-1. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... > > On the second test iteration. On 2.6.16, it takes about 10 iterations to get one > filesystem to do this. I'll need to look into this one further. I'm going to > reboot the machine and run some dbench tests (which typically don't trigger > this problem) and then come back to this one with added debugging.... > Is this with version 2 of your patch? Could you also try the -mm tree and see if the problem goes away. We have a set of patches to address exactly this problem. Balbir Singh, Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/