Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:26:09 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
To:     Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
cc:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] coccinelle: misc: add uninitialized_var.cocci
 script
In-Reply-To: <d7dcb9b4-4093-d0a3-5277-b50e212a5700@linux.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2008292225550.3629@hadrien>
References: <20200811210127.11889-1-efremov@linux.com> <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2008292133360.3629@hadrien> <489164b541e344f254b70429e4f6d467e1602931.camel@perches.com> <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2008292146170.3629@hadrien>
 <d7dcb9b4-4093-d0a3-5277-b50e212a5700@linux.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, Denis Efremov wrote:

>
>
> On 8/29/20 10:48 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 21:36 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, Denis Efremov wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Commit 63a0895d960a ("compiler: Remove uninitialized_var() macro") and
> >>>> commit 4b19bec97c88 ("docs: deprecated.rst: Add uninitialized_var()")
> >>>> removed uninitialized_var() and deprecated it.
> >>>>
> >>>> The purpose of this script is to prevent new occurrences of open-coded
> >>>> variants of uninitialized_var().
> >>
> >>>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> >>>> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
> >>>
> >>> Applied, without the commented out part.
> >>>
> >>> I only got three warnings, though.  Perhaps the others have been fixed?
> >>
> >> uninitialized_var does not exist in -next
>
> Yes, and this rule checks for not introducing these initializations once again.
>
> i.e, checks for:
>
> int a = a;
>
> int a = *(&a);
>
> >
> > OK, if it seems better, I can remove it.  Out of the threee reported, one
> > was a completely unnecessary initialization.
> >
>
> I would like send v2 with better description and link to the documentation because it's
> now available online:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#uninitialized-var

OK, thanks.

julia