Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp838931pxk; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 02:31:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxgMz8UxGjiRJtV6nXXi+gIgEjS38v8s7yUjnxYLD8Rbqhp+H2y7nnWONGgLxdOYw5jtSM X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:af42:: with SMTP id ly2mr274546ejb.362.1598866299084; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 02:31:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598866299; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bXF0mau8VJLv9PqcFBYwPlMhhuhplmf/iJO64CgRhlPCW4A/z/NQp5dMvVwm4fWPIX ONjJ3XVlYZ3PDUAQ9qhiEI5TCygpDHYIlxtbudwS/gxJ+Kma11QVGMn+O6nft26nm6/0 SVrYklx1GTThQ/F4PzQvY3swHV49oSBOkTNJoYQxDI1qDCClaBLi565aSXz/Kxhu/pkx MPnzkN+WXMS/ADI03nzxv5wu87EMLBNrCUfTv+Y5wjWlrYoj1QUK9kgO9S2LIrnsZTvS IGHiW6v9ytmrJdvBf4MaOlXWiGA/tAPmDjAB9rXg6MjZJxfyt/qFzZzRC12nZPx+OIDJ SrJQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:date:from:dkim-signature; bh=3L07aghnJbyRPZJOaFH3eUdaOzbfg9qRZ9biyh0gbQw=; b=SrLMU/guO1b2feJIca5vUd5fEBxqtlQHuFJ1x8CzF0xYl9zLuxwcwe0CvonmqJsGK1 7XJJCvk4/2Tbve/pblLLypfDTv1iEv/YmJFccA9t2ulhzF1apDZDpFttqCxa0WebINOn AYZoarpYq1vrWid83Z1SXc1b2nGoKlWF42MRKv6t4vzQtLFFWrLyqNaJrti0Ypg6NkDP ymivMlJmq1jQXGITYGkCWHszOZZFPS83CwNpaFUa4h/G1fmQEOVsT5GmHumV4iTw6EL4 ueBJH53vysiO/SKBAKc3lk2TBoCEc5+SY30LXxkqJk+snCfx36VDG8Z47pSab/ez7ExX FDHQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=k5Ws0UL8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d26si4901248edq.235.2020.08.31.02.31.15; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 02:31:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=k5Ws0UL8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726100AbgHaJai (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 05:30:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55376 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725960AbgHaJah (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 05:30:37 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x242.google.com (mail-lj1-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::242]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA76BC061573; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 02:30:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x242.google.com with SMTP id g6so5807930ljn.11; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 02:30:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=3L07aghnJbyRPZJOaFH3eUdaOzbfg9qRZ9biyh0gbQw=; b=k5Ws0UL8DCYFpZ3p/74f3BUt0hgRrU3trw42TZauoyKkjpfSFJFyYr1RO/SRfBMOhi BXz4zu1Y/AXYTZvnUIhAYZDjF+uurBQ2YeDIRQRwHIxRaPEQI8qTJ9y37WP5zkbPr2yh xr/K9FGTtSwcHebyK5L5C4ePQ/2hud3fJYR3KNZRpUKXUqcawO8d+85asH9Ef0vk1hKV mtv6t7ZTms1obcNAhLsK54eUaIRoymgFK6cTCXAfndNpmXvmTuBW/atDSbcO/L1Wd7UP uxIRCTOVlYtwXkfItQA4ecN9H6CdgxFAAGd/qOyVDb0i2qAx9TGJCvMWkCFuIS5y9hcW mhNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=3L07aghnJbyRPZJOaFH3eUdaOzbfg9qRZ9biyh0gbQw=; b=NwVnnbaNGqnMKZfkvg7UFsfLtj23lUuFLn0ozVIk2uNcIzIbfNhQx0UTXQXyYIU1X2 zn2XQw757YVMjqBWL69yKCQo19NskIXcXI0FCmq+lKiqi0t5n95mCP+infTR9EDkWb56 20m20FHPoNBOZ4uuPvCHPrUlXes+B+aA0RFKDAUhVJi83Q75WW457880uJqZK0xYi4Uf S+WgDCKRH7/G6bIHYNc6vUSfmjvz+aMx9WAQvbcYiHA39T0iRAjJNosHsSiNlg+eObWL T/MyGKR2NMsTB4LXg/SLJvhTXv4U6AfZLL07QxKXPKcrXYhesX81djFbTE0r0xRIV89Y wKZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5318/UM9FQAq/ALQ8crJ0zQIF0yL9tzK26HDGThavmtU4ZY4bUV2 U9ySbT0t9+Bdr9obMOI/aso= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:208:: with SMTP id y8mr250939ljn.233.1598866235282; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 02:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc636 (h5ef52e31.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i187sm794599lfd.65.2020.08.31.02.30.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 02:30:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:30:32 +0200 To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Joel Fernandes , Uladzislau Rezki , "Zhang, Qiang" , Josh Triplett , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , rcu , LKML Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?5Zue5aSN?= =?utf-8?Q?=3A?= [PATCH] rcu: shrink each possible cpu krcp Message-ID: <20200831093032.GA19139@pc636> References: <20200818210355.GM27891@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200818215511.GA2538@pc636> <20200818220245.GO27891@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200819135654.GB3875610@google.com> <20200819152159.GX27891@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200819155808.GA8817@pc636> <20200820223957.GB120898@google.com> <20200821153328.GH2855@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200821153328.GH2855@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:33:28AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 06:39:57PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 05:58:08PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 08:21:59AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 09:56:54AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 03:00:55AM +0000, Zhang, Qiang wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > > > > > 发件人: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org 代表 Joel Fernandes > > > > > > 发送时间: 2020年8月19日 8:04 > > > > > > 收件人: Paul E. McKenney > > > > > > 抄送: Uladzislau Rezki; Zhang, Qiang; Josh Triplett; Steven Rostedt; Mathieu Desnoyers; Lai Jiangshan; rcu; LKML > > > > > > 主题: Re: [PATCH] rcu: shrink each possible cpu krcp > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:02 PM Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > > > > > > > > index b8ccd7b5af82..6decb9ad2421 100644 > > > > > > > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c > > > > > > > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > > > > > > > > @@ -2336,10 +2336,15 @@ int rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu) > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu); > > > > > > > > struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode; /* Outgoing CPU's rdp & rnp. */ > > > > > > > > + struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)) > > > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Drain the kcrp of this CPU. IRQs should be disabled? */ > > > > > > > > + krcp = this_cpu_ptr(&krc) > > > > > > > > + schedule_delayed_work(&krcp->monitor_work, 0); > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A cpu can be offlined and its krp will be stuck until a shrinker is involved. > > > > > > > > Maybe be never. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does the same apply to its kmalloc() per-CPU caches? If so, I have a > > > > > > > hard time getting too worried about it. ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > >Looking at slab_offline_cpu() , that calls cancel_delayed_work_sync() > > > > > > >on the cache reaper who's job is to flush the per-cpu caches. So I > > > > > > >believe during CPU offlining, the per-cpu slab caches are flushed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > >- Joel > > > > > > > > > > > > When cpu going offline, the slub or slab only flush free objects in offline > > > > > > cpu cache, put these free objects in node list or return buddy system, > > > > > > for those who are still in use, they still stay offline cpu cache. > > > > > > > > > > > > If we want clean per-cpu "krcp" objects when cpu going offline. we should > > > > > > free "krcp" cache objects in "rcutree_offline_cpu", this func be called > > > > > > before other rcu cpu offline func. and then "rcutree_offline_cpu" will be > > > > > > called in "cpuhp/%u" per-cpu thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you please wrap text properly when you post to mailing list, thanks. I > > > > > fixed it for you above. > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > > > > > > index 8ce77d9ac716..1812d4a1ac1b 100644 > > > > > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c > > > > > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > > > > > > @@ -3959,6 +3959,7 @@ int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu) > > > > > > unsigned long flags; > > > > > > struct rcu_data *rdp; > > > > > > struct rcu_node *rnp; > > > > > > + struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp; > > > > > > > > > > > > rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu); > > > > > > rnp = rdp->mynode; > > > > > > @@ -3970,6 +3971,11 @@ int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu) > > > > > > > > > > > > // nohz_full CPUs need the tick for stop-machine to work quickly > > > > > > tick_dep_set(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + krcp = per_cpu_ptr(&krc, cpu); > > > > > > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags); > > > > > > + schedule_delayed_work(&krcp->monitor_work, 0); > > > > > > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags); > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > > > > > I realized the above is not good enough for what this is trying to do. Unlike > > > > > the slab, the new kfree_rcu objects cannot always be drained / submitted to > > > > > RCU because the previous batch may still be waiting for a grace period. So > > > > > the above code could very well return with the yet-to-be-submitted kfree_rcu > > > > > objects still in the cache. > > > > > > > > > > One option is to spin-wait here for monitor_todo to be false and keep calling > > > > > kfree_rcu_drain_unlock() till then. > > > > > > > > > > But then that's not good enough either, because if new objects are queued > > > > > when interrupts are enabled in the CPU offline path, then the cache will get > > > > > new objects after the previous set was drained. Further, spin waiting may > > > > > introduce deadlocks. > > > > > > > > > > Another option is to switch the kfree_rcu() path to non-batching (so new > > > > > objects cannot be cached in the offline path and are submitted directly to > > > > > RCU), wait for a GP and then submit the work. But then not sure if 1-argument > > > > > kfree_rcu() will like that. > > > > > > > > Or spawn a workqueue that does something like this: > > > > > > > > 1. Get any pending kvfree_rcu() requests sent off to RCU. > > > > > > > > 2. Do an rcu_barrier(). > > > > > > > > 3. Do the cleanup actions. > > > > > > > > > Probably Qian's original fix for for_each_possible_cpus() is good enough for > > > > > the shrinker case, and then we can tackle the hotplug one. > > > > > > > > It might take some experimentation to find the best solution. > > > > > > > > > > > > > static void do_idle(void) > > > { > > > ... > > > while (!need_resched()) { > > > rmb(); > > > > > > local_irq_disable(); > > > > > > if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) { > > > tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(); > > > cpuhp_report_idle_dead(); > > > -> cpuhp_report_idle_dead(void) > > > -> rcu_report_dead(smp_processor_id()); > > > arch_cpu_idle_dead(); > > > } > > > ... > > > > > > > > > We have the rcu_report_dead() callback. When it gets called IRQs are off > > > and CPU that is in question is offline. > > > > > > krcp = per_cpu_ptr(&krc, cpu); > > > raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags); > > > krcp->monotro_todo = true; > > > schedule_delayed_work(&krcp->monitor_work, 0); > > > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags); > > > > > > If there is a batch that is in progress, the job will rearm itself. > > > But i agree, it requires more experiments. > > > > I chatted with Ulad and we believe the timer and/or (delayed) workqueue will > > get migrated during the CPU offline path, so it is not an issue. > > > > In this case, Qiang's initial patch suffices to fix the shrinker issue. > > As in the patch that is currented in -rcu, correct? > The "[PATCH] rcu: shrink each possible cpu krcp" will fix the shrinker "issue" when CPU goes offline. So that was valid concern. As for "main track", our drain work or a timer that triggers it will be migrated anyway. Just to repeat what Joel wrote earlier, we do not have any issues with this part. -- Vlad Rezki