Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1298450pxk; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:39:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzF9UDOOYbshKwFplXrpLCx935a2clPAnb4NUCpRslFQ36O+Pc+hzZd2Cs2ec6MgNM0ImAJ X-Received: by 2002:a50:ef15:: with SMTP id m21mr3167561eds.300.1598913572132; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:39:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598913572; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=o64F1+4pi+xsToOeP9f1G57PFiE8GAzDtjNPegmSROSgANjySXPqaz9WcPIyt+8esO gf4+1OW9xWDvi+V6g3H2PKCnFVgM7JEoN0ehd5wk/aOCyvK+L3BOz+BQ6vEsv3chxMck WC/ZX8TsZ74BmCunOXnT8tAY5Cpi/KsmvcGlQokDloWbfRmAR2W9pf35CrAuOLxkAR3b uFt4F9OKHaU119u6FC8OYX38wve3pMhefyK9oIQm27i+EUElBqiEBxStQPidRNAIQSPO eo1kDepf4JMsPHydOjrlyMaV8iEIAedQywqjMjdjvRGO2SbPLr4Z6bwuCyTPc7WOLe6a gfYA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=gD2EUAgw+5swDWmJUhc9zDfyO1xHA5IZOaVWTfOzjp8=; b=tmvf7JrNRtP+HZERWS1x7v6rzvooM/taHOPa9u7DEQ3cL7Yj1zUOA0HjW7lH4O3YDN iXXYccqraqHGO9SCv2f4YUHeV8d/5DPqUbF5aULnHBEfnxydSUFGpI7ktGPvI+onwxzd Ay5s6DeCJWQ+BmpWazKnJAbOFlTj/eKd4NdTmMJ8UPoVgTYIj2MVdJI+Kyfgm2rWOoV4 ThhAGWc8LR+yWwoLkytJhCEtp2rJAJJri2RG36mvX1xIVpl+9YISB2psZPHfSPR2oV85 su6ZGn29D6Jp2deArqaggYuvBlzLG17WhUCWjbFIkvnFa1e1LE//1LSdySAY8PhKiwj3 Bepw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dn2si5893157edb.378.2020.08.31.15.39.09; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:39:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729328AbgHaTDP (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:03:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60448 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727993AbgHaTDO (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 15:03:14 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:3a1::42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB557C061573; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D24B72D5; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 13:03:12 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Markus Heiser Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after upgrading sphinx Message-ID: <20200831130312.0a2cbd0c@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20200827145017.47c16c73@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20200827145017.47c16c73@canb.auug.org.au> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:50:17 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today I upgraded ot sphinx v3.2.1 and got the following error from > "make htmldocs": > > Running Sphinx v3.2.1 > enabling CJK for LaTeX builder > > Extension error: > Could not import extension cdomain (exception: cannot import name 'c_funcptr_sig_re' from 'sphinx.domains.c' (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/domains/c.py)) > > I have downgraded to version 2.4.3 and await suggestions/patches :-) [Adding Markus] Markus, this looks like an issue with the "handle function-like macros" code that has your name on it. The Sphinx folks think that functionality can just be removed: https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/7421 Do you agree? We need to look at what they're saying about the :name: directive as well; somehow I missed that when it first went in. Thanks, jon