Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <137effceca0474e30bfbbfbbd71f9fbca53e1b9b.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: Abort tasks before clear them from
 doorbell
From:   Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
To:     Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     asutoshd@codeaurora.org, nguyenb@codeaurora.org,
        hongwus@codeaurora.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
        saravanak@google.com, salyzyn@google.com,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 31 Aug 2020 21:38:30 +0200
In-Reply-To: <ca7a01a24c8189646b5e7bb6bc8899bb@codeaurora.org>
References: <1598321228-21093-1-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org>
         <1598321228-21093-2-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org>
         <26bfbdf4e5c5802cce6b0ddf5eddbd75bd306d0f.camel@gmail.com>
         <ca7a01a24c8189646b5e7bb6bc8899bb@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 09:20 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2020-08-31 02:11, Bean Huo wrote:
> > Hi Can
> > This patch conflicts and be not in line with this series patches :
> > h
> > ttps://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11709279/, which has been applied
> > into 5.9/scsi-fixes. But they are not apppiled in the 5.9/scsi-
> > queue.
> > 
> > Maybe you should rebase your patch from scsi-fixes branch. or do
> > you
> > have another better option?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Bean
> > 
> 
> I am pushing this change due to LINERSET handling needs it and
> LINERESET
> handling is added based on my previous changes to err_handler, which
> are
> picked by 5.10/scsi-queue. So the two are applied for 5.10/scsi-
> queue 
> only.
> Any conflicts you see on 5.10/scsi-queue?

Hi Can
I meant scsi-fixes branch. no conflict with scsi-queue branch. If the
the changes in the scsi-fixes branch  will never be merged to scsi-
queue branch.It is fine.

Thanks,
Bean

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Can Guo.