Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1392312pxk; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:59:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlTUt0ufNADNXu4M9lyGeDCwWi8Rf18ZYXovHxvCfS8Y/OYaM00xoLwrlKjWIbCEkFycPF X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:84e:: with SMTP id b14mr3578559edz.115.1598925549269; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:59:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598925549; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=L4yYmqk0ppxI4IoHATgGTsZzndMUPXUmwIYg/OrjCMP64p7K5EmdzBy/brdOZSG2R3 Db4RwpzXZyq6QLNZAtit9Coa35fJSXFrOht9WhrFEtP+cbntbN3iNcDFMofnTt5B2SFC Znex66Q1OTaPxv4ejbggD/NPVUHbpv+zviuhofczcGb+atzKwpzZ6MdH1dC53iAvu6Fi EpswDXh5tdmoLzKkqJwUbxJ9qeRxl1wRHqAhtn0OpeShE43oFR5/QRFTvxJfGlMe8afi LxDdRnh8/TKw7/HuY8WuaVOYilDub9e5lccofYY97y+A6fAoTSYtNLEfMOfpqpJQMJZj pj6w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject; bh=BVW0WZETUp20vYVwsEr7Uf1nYdxU0CA5cOH31Q+CW4o=; b=lcA3EVIlFD3BOipqtjn/Q7otwR8rzqZmQnZjCymUfKBioJ5dRHOXU4tu7LVVF0fG44 tOuKxA7/LP/ritCK58ZtgPrYzBmBQhfO8LIRPz4AY9MILUhno37WKsCdksEOC9O3tXbR i6Rw8RAJq52OOJZ7+qKriZ9M+vJC0MPxZTexv7ODcWwVWmKj/42dvw7bH7nHY5k40ZXf Vb60Lau2ohq6PAfzqw0PC7osUEpHBsGp0r2ch/spsPDXu92917cEX8Yr4S/HRjY+wrOa ZjsKJdKcWf8WphwhA6qyIqE2iFJzG/cyAHeb6m7iJnkv0Xn4p2cAfz70AnOr62N0439h y2kA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bz20si6876375ejc.242.2020.08.31.18.58.45; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726117AbgIAB5q (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 21:57:46 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:10740 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725941AbgIAB5q (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 21:57:46 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id DFD122C053DCDD80DE61; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:57:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.65.95.32) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:57:33 +0800 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] coresight: etm4x: Modify core-commit of cpu to avoid the overflow of HiSilicon ETM To: Mathieu Poirier References: <1597824397-29894-1-git-send-email-liuqi115@huawei.com> <20200831221308.GB207013@xps15> CC: , , , , , From: Qi Liu Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:57:33 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200831221308.GB207013@xps15> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.65.95.32] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mathieu, Thanks for your review. On 2020/9/1 6:13, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Following Al's comment I have the following recommendations... > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:06:37PM +0800, Qi Liu wrote: >> When too much trace information is generated on-chip, the ETM will >> overflow, and cause data loss. This is a common phenomenon on ETM >> devices. >> >> But sometimes we do not want to lose performance trace data, so we >> suppress the speed of instructions sent from CPU core to ETM to >> avoid the overflow of ETM. >> >> Signed-off-by: Qi Liu >> --- >> >> Changes since v1: >> - ETM on HiSilicon Hip09 platform supports backpressure, so does >> not need to modify core commit. >> >> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c >> index 7797a57..7641f89 100644 >> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c >> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c >> @@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(boot_enable, "Enable tracing on boot"); >> #define PARAM_PM_SAVE_NEVER 1 /* never save any state */ >> #define PARAM_PM_SAVE_SELF_HOSTED 2 /* save self-hosted state only */ >> >> +#define CORE_COMMIT_CLEAR 0x3000 >> +#define CORE_COMMIT_SHIFT 12 >> +#define HISI_ETM_AMBA_ID_V1 0x000b6d01 > Do you have a name for the SoC that can be added so that other HiSilicon SoC can > be added? I suggest something like: > > #define HISI_NAME_CORE_COMMIT_CLEAR > #define HISI_NAME_CORE_COMMIT_SHIFT > #define HISI_NAME_ETM_ID Will fix this next version. > Moreover I don't see an entry for 0x000b6d01 in the amba id table - is your > devices upstream? Needless to day that is mandatory in order to move forward > with this work. A patch has been applied to add this ETM id and here is the link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200813210000.GO3393195@xps15/ >> + >> static int pm_save_enable = PARAM_PM_SAVE_FIRMWARE; >> module_param(pm_save_enable, int, 0444); >> MODULE_PARM_DESC(pm_save_enable, >> @@ -104,11 +108,40 @@ struct etm4_enable_arg { >> int rc; >> }; >> >> +static void etm4_cpu_actlr1_cfg(void *info) >> +{ >> + struct etm4_enable_arg *arg = (struct etm4_enable_arg *)info; >> + u64 val; >> + >> + asm volatile("mrs %0,s3_1_c15_c2_5" : "=r"(val)); >> + val &= ~CORE_COMMIT_CLEAR; >> + val |= arg->rc << CORE_COMMIT_SHIFT; >> + asm volatile("msr s3_1_c15_c2_5,%0" : : "r"(val)); >> +} >> + >> +static void etm4_config_core_commit(int cpu, int val) >> +{ >> + struct etm4_enable_arg arg = {0}; >> + >> + arg.rc = val; >> + smp_call_function_single(cpu, etm4_cpu_actlr1_cfg, &arg, 1); >> +} >> + >> static int etm4_enable_hw(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata) >> { >> int i, rc; >> + struct amba_device *adev; >> struct etmv4_config *config = &drvdata->config; >> struct device *etm_dev = &drvdata->csdev->dev; >> + struct device *dev = drvdata->csdev->dev.parent; >> + >> + adev = container_of(dev, struct amba_device, dev); >> + /* >> + * If ETM device is HiSilicon ETM device, reduce the >> + * core-commit to avoid ETM overflow. >> + */ >> + if (adev->periphid == HISI_ETM_AMBA_ID_V1) >> + etm4_config_core_commit(drvdata->cpu, 1); > I susggest to add a function like etm4_enable_arch_specific() and do the above > in there. The same goes for the disable path. > > Thanks, > Mathieu Thanks, I'll fix this next version : ) Qi > >> CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base); >> >> @@ -472,10 +505,20 @@ static void etm4_disable_hw(void *info) >> { >> u32 control; >> struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata = info; >> + struct device *dev = drvdata->csdev->dev.parent; >> struct etmv4_config *config = &drvdata->config; >> struct device *etm_dev = &drvdata->csdev->dev; >> + struct amba_device *adev; >> int i; >> >> + adev = container_of(dev, struct amba_device, dev); >> + /* >> + * If ETM device is HiSilicon ETM device, resume the >> + * core-commit after ETM trace is complete. >> + */ >> + if (adev->periphid == HISI_ETM_AMBA_ID_V1) >> + etm4_config_core_commit(drvdata->cpu, 0); >> + >> CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base); >> >> if (!drvdata->skip_power_up) { >> -- >> 2.8.1 >> > . >