Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1475681pxk; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 22:27:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJysDGe0hkdu8VRlD2oR8BVaj9mIZAXZm6rJ1t4ui8ghkMA1C7n0PLNEB69QczoCCtjEDz3N X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2686:: with SMTP id t6mr18991ejc.406.1598938076281; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 22:27:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598938076; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=d4OCijHXZXAcSinpbVTsZSYnIXaNztyEs29Lmzk1Nn6CBPzzjmjqvgsHEwMPHUy1oZ b8X3TL17ORdr4W44vvfuY8grLppsUqwPVYGHfABmmwCtFkDsnQHSZR/Eikplt6coGtZH DvJVqC91hDhAh7oIuyrvPsV49UR9NWAGuB/Hdk9So6vorRwLuno0bIi1nK3jbxi3EZb9 RwetKd03sJe9D4MfTrbYUEeFbZss8S5oOECG74wjdfPbIg6/TIZ+VRD80LrwLf+OWV1D xaT0nhus/xXiesqcfQxf5Ibz4ad25pXjdSkomh/zj0t1kcN2eFFNcJzeLYjCuzr7Oa4I oQoQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject; bh=UG3QeAqOHvqZPqp4wW3x9Nz4H6mX1UJ3pF5yprvU2qo=; b=YAM0y8nS7X+I+L9JTOzIfLihRykxjEKmEXSgodQukInOe3q6u/ZW72q9tWKDmAmcij xm0vCmjnyFmwzW1nyTHUPLQ2vjBf+NC3YBGizGP3om15W+0MvhJMSuU8VfM8jaxwlLyV URo4gt3WVKRuvJ8zHOyCkyuyLlWLZl0aZLgWSy5Yn8JZdpdH7Wa6LACD0BJTYCAw1CID KwankKd01vJOkxvKwvZcUj+xw/ciwy09Z2UE3pjhZeFQFbioS3u9jgJ2Ss5S5H6f6a+r iE/MwvxANp1kgHst8eMAUw6IhQ9kd/120kSThV2eeSAbzMvXQwfcW2eksDeOjts1Idlz u6xg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lo4si100812ejb.190.2020.08.31.22.27.32; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 22:27:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726131AbgIAFZy (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 01:25:54 -0400 Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:27611 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726044AbgIAFZy (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 01:25:54 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,378,1592841600"; d="scan'208";a="98760910" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2020 13:25:52 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXMBPEKD06.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.206]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7D348990F7; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 13:25:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.167.226.60] (10.167.226.60) by G08CNEXMBPEKD06.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 13:25:49 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86/boot.rst: minor improvement From: Cao jin To: , , CC: , , , , References: <20200901034157.5482-1-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 13:25:53 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200901034157.5482-1-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.60] X-ClientProxiedBy: G08CNEXCHPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.203) To G08CNEXMBPEKD06.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.206) X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 7C7D348990F7.A9DD8 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com X-Spam-Status: No Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sorry, I mis-copied 2 addresses. make sure they are CCed. On 9/1/20 11:41 AM, Cao jin wrote: > Typo fix & file name update > > Signed-off-by: Cao jin > --- > Documentation/x86/boot.rst | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst > index 7fafc7ac00d7..c04afec90486 100644 > --- a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst > +++ b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst > @@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ can be calculated as follows:: > In addition to read/modify/write the setup header of the struct > boot_params as that of 16-bit boot protocol, the boot loader should > also fill the additional fields of the struct boot_params as described > -in zero-page.txt. > +in zero-page.rst. > > After setting up the struct boot_params, the boot loader can load > 64-bit kernel in the same way as that of 16-bit boot protocol, but > @@ -1391,7 +1391,7 @@ In 64-bit boot protocol, the kernel is started by jumping to the > > At entry, the CPU must be in 64-bit mode with paging enabled. > The range with setup_header.init_size from start address of loaded > -kernel and zero page and command line buffer get ident mapping; > +kernel and zero page and command line buffer get identity mapping; > a GDT must be loaded with the descriptors for selectors > __BOOT_CS(0x10) and __BOOT_DS(0x18); both descriptors must be 4G flat > segment; __BOOT_CS must have execute/read permission, and __BOOT_DS > -- Sincerely, Cao jin