Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030439AbWEZEq5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 00:46:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030435AbWEZEq5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 00:46:57 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:50842 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030434AbWEZEq4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 00:46:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 23:46:36 -0500 From: Jon Mason To: Andi Kleen Cc: Jon Mason , Muli Ben-Yehuda , Muli Ben-Yehuda , Linux-Kernel , discuss@x86-64.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU - introduce iommu_detected Message-ID: <20060526044636.GA31695@us.ibm.com> References: <20060525033408.GC7720@us.ibm.com> <200605250554.23534.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605250554.23534.ak@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1602 Lines: 38 On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:54:23AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thursday 25 May 2006 05:34, Jon Mason wrote: > > swiotlb relies on the gart specific iommu_aperture variable to know if > > we discovered a hardware IOMMU before swiotlb initialization. Introduce > > iommu_detected to do the same thing, but in a HW IOMMU neutral manner, > > in preparation for adding the Calgary HW IOMMU. > > I applied them all. > > But I think you broke the aperture setup. iommu_setup really > needs to be called early, otherwise aperture.c doesn't get > the right parameters. I undid that change. Actually, I didn't break aperture.c by moving iommu_setup because I moved iommu_hole_init after __setup. This change also enabled me to move back the calgary specific bootarg parsing (like you asked for in the original version of the path). Also, in the reworked version of iommu-abstraction on ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches has a bug. When iommu_setup was kept in it's original form, the "+__setup("iommu=", iommu_setup);" wasn't removed, which gives 2 calls to the same function. I'll send updated versions of the patches here shortly which will apply cleanly inplace to that tree. > > And please next time send against the latest tree. It required > quite some tweaking to apply. Sorry, I'll be happy to do it next time :) Thanks, Jon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/