Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1801247pxk; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:08:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRSVOZ9VibBpoVagmkZhD1YzXZwjlIiULWx4t8rlJcHJWGunSBeUAmOZ23a+FSUYqqlaTW X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1691:: with SMTP id s17mr1955323ejd.458.1598972915643; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 08:08:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598972915; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=C3lXJzIrZDrrBfasDfHKwLVY5GbFZahz/loB51j57f6RjLMGAv/zX9x37RRCFYQI1Z hAlBbwcetjhe6N0r6aH0rhVgwaMCMl97AZBbjY/A3zkG0Wnd0NAtgF5ZitggTPsf1VKY g1540SUokPtVtK49iTaPdWQajxbXf597cb01m3tXWSSSkU7AYIAIzH2V+0GR/Tg7C+9u YvEUpf3KsIlGNzUaE+VQdGKqGH/cW+Bv3ksLW19belx2EAM2x89rolZFwpYD1YAJ21ga tn5fUuPgQgIvp5ISCLAarHiqp7PZERIKtoR+/KTmflq+OWaHlVgnCeEhER1d8ilRmeO7 xSwA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=Deo7R2RWDrvI2/GZNGLbDBpP4YYsxAUvL+yDlGefA6U=; b=cqdh/L6dF8LEEu9s61OiKsCJsVy7OE7SpF+sNhJSLjBsluWFjwkZvj1IphaUdI0gUV afh0CdRKj4b3e751wWMV3v5H4rdv+NpHndXSiIOEyavUD5U3Z88cUvFRFeybAOka0lmh tx5XrARWefuyedk+Pq16MH8lOITsChD5WGao6wabph2hO8sbLF44OgqoiP3xfcrWL38h e5SJytHctcEsdJDLI2Gy6P9EYVTMIvOD9LPp4wAwu9f9BTPo50Wu1jCE4V9eTY6Ikagd Y5ZBkfxFcYnp/+uPBN5J+r7JGuxw6O8qcad9bmWWmnwvoUhHOsoFFB6h8KN1pifLg9Eq HM4Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=wLK8Ef5f; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pg7si787411ejb.395.2020.09.01.08.08.03; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 08:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=wLK8Ef5f; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728506AbgIAPGu (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:06:50 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49284 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728660AbgIAPGe (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:06:34 -0400 Received: from quaco.ghostprotocols.net (unknown [179.97.37.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E80A20BED; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:06:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598972792; bh=LCDLVU8qJ08+iGKXvR5r+dlBm0nlk/9Y29X+1wE/JVY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=wLK8Ef5foZZY9WpTlt3nC2+tsUSLEyQxiyf5H/RBoWYmwEO2QoYZ/eHVD2muJFJpg 5WOKgM/vWtbB3NNEhXL/iQWnZVLCKyIAz1/MGSqIRO2Nv5dNEuM0cxu4VgqNBsowle Lvl53dXC9yzmzRRa6ukDJ4+J8VHvveL/geeqQAcQ= Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A4AB540D3D; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:06:30 -0300 (-03) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:06:30 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Al Grant Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Andi Kleen , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: correct SNOOPX field offset Message-ID: <20200901150630.GB1424523@kernel.org> References: <9974f2d0-bf7f-518e-d9f7-4520e5ff1bb0@foss.arm.com> <20200825174043.GQ1509399@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20200826142631.GA5351@redhat.com> <20200901150225.GA1424523@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200901150225.GA1424523@kernel.org> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:02:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Al Grant escreveu: > > On 26/08/2020 15:26, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:43AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu: > > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Al Grant wrote: > > > > > perf_event.h has macros that define the field offsets in the > > > > > data_src bitmask in perf records. The SNOOPX and REMOTE offsets > > > > > were both 37. These are distinct fields, and the bitfield layout > > > > > in perf_mem_data_src confirms that SNOOPX should be at offset 38. > > > > > > > > Looks good. > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen > > > > > > > > Probably should have a Fixes: header > > > > > > Please do so, find the patch that introduced the error, add the Fixes > > > tag, will help me not having to do it myself :-) > > > > Fixes: 52839e653b562 ("perf tools: Add support for printing new mem_info > > encodings") > > Ok, I'll add that, thanks. > > But you forgot to add your Signed-off-by:, can you please provide it? > > There was also a minor problem in the patch, there was no separation of > --- from the patch comment section to the patch itself, I'll fix that as > well. Also you mixed up tools/ with include/ things, the perf part of the kernel is maintained by Ingo, PeterZ. Peter, the patch is the one below, I'll collect the tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h bit as it fixes the tooling, please consider taking the kernel part. Thanks, - Arnaldo --- From: Al Grant Subject: [PATCH] perf: correct SNOOPX field offset Message-ID: <9974f2d0-bf7f-518e-d9f7-4520e5ff1bb0@foss.arm.com> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:28:34 +0100 perf_event.h has macros that define the field offsets in the data_src bitmask in perf records. The SNOOPX and REMOTE offsets were both 37. These are distinct fields, and the bitfield layout in perf_mem_data_src confirms that SNOOPX should be at offset 38. Signed-off-by: Al Grant --- include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +- tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h index 077e7ee69e3d..3e5dcdd48a49 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h @@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@ union perf_mem_data_src { #define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_FWD 0x01 /* forward */ /* 1 free */ -#define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_SHIFT 37 +#define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_SHIFT 38 /* locked instruction */ #define PERF_MEM_LOCK_NA 0x01 /* not available */ diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h index 077e7ee69e3d..3e5dcdd48a49 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h @@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@ union perf_mem_data_src { #define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_FWD 0x01 /* forward */ /* 1 free */ -#define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_SHIFT 37 +#define PERF_MEM_SNOOPX_SHIFT 38 /* locked instruction */ #define PERF_MEM_LOCK_NA 0x01 /* not available */