Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1802088pxk; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:09:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkU7wqzjsmbMT2lPn8kZPeurCbr6X4Clm5qg0qtdxhka7nTirZXuasFeUo8Uio4o7O1GaY X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f0c1:: with SMTP id dk1mr1960900ejb.44.1598972978722; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 08:09:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598972978; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ihjoCMZquyVtO/MHkvuozc8zv47jqCcPrCa1FrDeqyxzaLRV+ceBlFUHlVSacxZ9tW zAY4lWwlKvBPl00y8x6VyripUY7f2q5JRWEVSMRmiMYh6z0KjCipxZNb2FtOM4pl6Xt8 IcPCP33lBaA8HfrBhF7EcjL6MrqPCNiM+rsKvypM3LB8QkoXKfegezQq9k8bRR6eV3lu 36IXXZNa9qv4WG6xlPoBdZnflDiArEyAh9H2OdIesLkl75AL4dhCpGJzoFDHxMGpNdnj 3KFTBRD7nekMo0SZ859PkyHmqLQJ6CFnUZzs8zB5CakCd6AObbYluqRaHabR2noKhY3w 61rg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=qchxD+jC97IBtQRuin+Ii4/g5YDXj4cTYboUvkQdxeg=; b=rL6X1VcwW6f1oV4VZAd+7gfOzGm9xFNrX0xUKc1g6hSXdhm7Rvj4gVhC22cSbctbcU SD60QUu8a9VpYmdxr9twMbDJqBkscetNohl4dZQVD6c7U1enypK0gDRYqFuPr9X59Er6 mccBppBgWDPVXLFoKEphJN0oClRTpNfN/t/8zr6k2a94tYCgGBL8JWdrW2R+/hdAyuWf FE1B+mL6MDkheNiIhxADZpbGqRc7ZT6i9QGuxH2tPfrhHp/W7fP2rxIcbDVxrDAsCpME gFDfQUKH2tmSrCvC9DJeC2Ljn21ssQz8pJ/V+D+UYaQZAOFVCc9ywFoZ89hDKB8fcdGh UrDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m1si790822ejj.381.2020.09.01.08.09.05; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 08:09:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728173AbgIAPGE (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:06:04 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:43104 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726771AbgIAPF5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:05:57 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DDE1045; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.5.66] (unknown [10.57.5.66]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B77623F71F; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:05:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: correct SNOOPX field offset To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Andi Kleen , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <9974f2d0-bf7f-518e-d9f7-4520e5ff1bb0@foss.arm.com> <20200825174043.GQ1509399@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20200826142631.GA5351@redhat.com> <20200901150225.GA1424523@kernel.org> From: Al Grant Message-ID: <67062e1a-98b1-1f0d-d405-2c0dc2ce655a@foss.arm.com> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 16:05:50 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200901150225.GA1424523@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/09/2020 16:02, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Al Grant escreveu: >> On 26/08/2020 15:26, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>> Em Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:43AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu: >>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Al Grant wrote: >>>>> perf_event.h has macros that define the field offsets in the >>>>> data_src bitmask in perf records. The SNOOPX and REMOTE offsets >>>>> were both 37. These are distinct fields, and the bitfield layout >>>>> in perf_mem_data_src confirms that SNOOPX should be at offset 38. >>>> >>>> Looks good. >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen >>>> >>>> Probably should have a Fixes: header >>> >>> Please do so, find the patch that introduced the error, add the Fixes >>> tag, will help me not having to do it myself :-) >> >> Fixes: 52839e653b562 ("perf tools: Add support for printing new mem_info >> encodings") > > Ok, I'll add that, thanks. > > But you forgot to add your Signed-off-by:, can you please provide it? Signed-off-by: Al Grant > There was also a minor problem in the patch, there was no separation of > --- from the patch comment section to the patch itself, I'll fix that as > well. Thanks, will remember for next time. Al