Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To:     Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
        Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Address some HWP-related oddities
Date:   Tue, 01 Sep 2020 19:23:06 +0200
Message-ID: <3748218.V0HrpZKF9g@kreacher>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi All,

The last two patches in the v3 needed to be updated to take re-enabling of HWP
after an ACPI S3 suspend/resume cycle into account appropriately.  The first
three patches are the same as before.

The purpose of this series is to address some peculiarities related to
taking CPUs offline/online and switching between different operation
modes with HWP enabled that have become visible after allowing the
driver to work in the passive mode with HWP enabled in 5.9-rc1 (and
one that was there earlier, but can be addressed easily after the
changes made in 5.9-rc1).

Please refer to the patch changelogs for details.

For easier testing/review, the series is available from the git branch at:

 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
 intel_pstate-testing

I've done my best to address all of the possible corner cases, but the test
matrix is quite extensive and I may have missed something, so go ahead
and test.

Thanks,
Rafael