Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1926598pxk; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:02:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxswvMZnYKIJnaGGwGeW53656CUfrWG3uHkIQN/PuHd5UnVOwkQEe8xLuXxBjoJhMxtFaph X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ccd8:: with SMTP id ot24mr2734287ejb.75.1598983338909; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 11:02:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598983338; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eeWTg5BjZJd2QxxsWUBc2a4O4yXEcYa+g/Wpgy2j02DvVD09PDNHuJ+y+yEDVEIAX8 4i9sGNIxmWuz+NtMMwdMwNUWgM+DPcWVYnijouxfY9A516pOw3ZN2yQKFvTAGYH4mdhj JATAZm2V2j+u9+cDeJb0q7M3Ox7obMyJcg+y5PgL8WMZU2SSWPG399KAxrEuP7zX9W1P nQ1z4izUXiYMKoN4pgx//OODgAMoqO6moWWr40nBeDi7m4JvP0v+TgUkdDPyp6pv9D/h +dEOCm47bL117TsFz91mpYCobTnPqZEsue2oG7EaZ1SvFoDx1GOf5v03TJqxzlkDpgm1 pRAw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=6MILb0UVSpLTmZ/9H5igiM4lOT3DxfW/6UKy7MJszkU=; b=c8/2HQb2juQ/R2h/pzREZ8lRN2bCfI6AXStdjQWPdOVXKeBKr+6dE7dtC875vA/rak bMNCpJJs39Ve3/X/AMQIgvAqbXy/uOJTAi7hM0bs6CX2ulRqU3kxSdpPTgq7EggQCcUL lA1pmQxVw+mrLObdVLBAolF8q4HttSosvL8SKYXqxNZEZiQQp16oCDWjluBCWohFDweQ wQMLMOj4ezISMNSv8L/Alz0x/zC+JJpan6c7sHSpcxxXEatlH4tC65lBxuB4mcB+r3Jw x+Yl+jWGCSjUs24EqU4D2cvbJAGSruynWUHIolIyFIl7nyyta7qtkGrd6Sa2iXsJbBDZ rEdg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a12si1149543eje.638.2020.09.01.11.01.54; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 11:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729408AbgIAR6b (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 13:58:31 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:21068 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726140AbgIAR63 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 13:58:29 -0400 IronPort-SDR: tsaXhVb5DH2Pqio5lfj0Dj4oJhOMtQMkHO/iirC3pO/QCkzQ1DxXAJobuqs34X4DY9dRa1Mcc8 IukZZxe/vxKw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9731"; a="144922321" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,379,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="144922321" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Sep 2020 10:58:27 -0700 IronPort-SDR: XwMESqPFxr04kLMfyQaui9VPnLF/D1itQuPP2/9KGJduUhBwiqOg07SfbLgLhc4VMmOKQNhS4d WGuXhXSy4f2Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,379,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="477293602" Received: from yyu32-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.241.30]) ([10.212.241.30]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Sep 2020 10:58:25 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl functions for shadow stack To: Florian Weimer Cc: "H.J. Lu" , Dave Martin , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , LKML , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux-MM , linux-arch , Linux API , Arnd Bergmann , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue , Weijiang Yang References: <20200825002540.3351-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20200825002540.3351-26-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <2d253891-9393-44d0-35e0-4b9a2da23cec@intel.com> <086c73d8-9b06-f074-e315-9964eb666db9@intel.com> <73c2211f-8811-2d9f-1930-1c5035e6129c@intel.com> <20200826164604.GW6642@arm.com> <87ft892vvf.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20200826170841.GX6642@arm.com> <87tuwow7kg.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <873648w6qr.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <3c12b6ee-7c93-dcf4-fbf7-2698003386dd@intel.com> <87o8mpqtcn.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 10:58:25 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87o8mpqtcn.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/1/2020 10:50 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Yu-cheng Yu: > >> Like other arch_prctl()'s, this parameter was 'unsigned long' >> earlier. The idea was, since this arch_prctl is only implemented for >> the 64-bit kernel, we wanted it to look as 64-bit only. I will change >> it back to 'unsigned long'. > > What about x32? In general, long is rather problematic for x32. The problem is the size of 'long', right? Because this parameter is passed in a register, and only the lower bits are used, x32 works as well.