Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: PKw8KBYDoU8ZLUShZh7Wm8URCC04sN1rFEAmLYf/diilx5b7sKDFAeU5R/QPX8NmT6Rw0TdOVL
 6BMNfBIKc2gw==
IronPort-SDR: Y0QpoXYKfjIAJWqzdi17Y3vk5+rA+zAu5vHVuWaXf0bYuO1wpbjNTy5TbTnVxh2ahy0BpyG7nV
 o8/m22Zl9uTQ==
Message-ID: <818b61c1375dabc60df770bbc462ce6728091dbc.camel@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Address some HWP-related
 oddities
From:   Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
        Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 01 Sep 2020 12:07:11 -0700
In-Reply-To: <3748218.V0HrpZKF9g@kreacher>
References: <3748218.V0HrpZKF9g@kreacher>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 (3.34.4-1.fc31) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 19:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> The last two patches in the v3 needed to be updated to take re-
> enabling of HWP
> after an ACPI S3 suspend/resume cycle into account
> appropriately.  The first
> three patches are the same as before.
> 
> The purpose of this series is to address some peculiarities related
> to
> taking CPUs offline/online and switching between different operation
> modes with HWP enabled that have become visible after allowing the
> driver to work in the passive mode with HWP enabled in 5.9-rc1 (and
> one that was there earlier, but can be addressed easily after the
> changes made in 5.9-rc1).
> 
> Please refer to the patch changelogs for details.
> 
> For easier testing/review, the series is available from the git
> branch at:
> 
>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
>  intel_pstate-testing
> 
> I've done my best to address all of the possible corner cases, but
> the test
> matrix is quite extensive and I may have missed something, so go
> ahead
> and test.

Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>


> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 
> 
>