Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 08/32] drm: i915: fix common struct
 sg_table related issues
To:     "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
References: <20200826063316.23486-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
 <CGME20200826063532eucas1p2a9e0215f483104d45af0560d5dbfa8e0@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
 <20200826063316.23486-9-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
 <259df561c4bb4ef484799e3776dbb402@intel.com>
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Message-ID: <1825327a-efd5-b836-d57e-d9356e279762@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Sep 2020 20:54:12 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <259df561c4bb4ef484799e3776dbb402@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2020-09-01 20:38, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
>> Marek Szyprowski
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 2:33 AM
>> To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org;
>> linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>; David Airlie
>> <airlied@linux.ie>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Robin Murphy
>> <robin.murphy@arm.com>; Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>; linux-arm-
>> kernel@lists.infradead.org; Marek Szyprowski
>> <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 08/32] drm: i915: fix common struct sg_table
>> related issues
>>
>> The Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt states that the dma_map_sg()
>> function
>> returns the number of the created entries in the DMA address space.
>> However the subsequent calls to the dma_sync_sg_for_{device,cpu}() and
>> dma_unmap_sg must be called with the original number of the entries
>> passed to the dma_map_sg().
>>
>> struct sg_table is a common structure used for describing a non-contiguous
>> memory buffer, used commonly in the DRM and graphics subsystems. It
>> consists of a scatterlist with memory pages and DMA addresses (sgl entry),
>> as well as the number of scatterlist entries: CPU pages (orig_nents entry)
>> and DMA mapped pages (nents entry).
>>
>> It turned out that it was a common mistake to misuse nents and orig_nents
>> entries, calling DMA-mapping functions with a wrong number of entries or
>> ignoring the number of mapped entries returned by the dma_map_sg()
>> function.
>>
>> This driver creatively uses sg_table->orig_nents to store the size of the
>> allocated scatterlist and ignores the number of the entries returned by
>> dma_map_sg function. The sg_table->orig_nents is (mis)used to properly
>> free the (over)allocated scatterlist.
>>
>> This patch only introduces the common DMA-mapping wrappers operating
>> directly on the struct sg_table objects to the dmabuf related functions,
>> so the other drivers, which might share buffers with i915 could rely on
>> the properly set nents and orig_nents values.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c       | 11 +++--------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/mock_dmabuf.c |  7 +++----
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>> index 2679380159fc..8a988592715b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>> @@ -48,12 +48,9 @@ static struct sg_table *i915_gem_map_dma_buf(struct
>> dma_buf_attachment *attachme
>> 		src = sg_next(src);
>> 	}
>>
>> -	if (!dma_map_sg_attrs(attachment->dev,
>> -			      st->sgl, st->nents, dir,
>> -			      DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC)) {
>> -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> 
> You have dropped this error value.
> 
> Do you now if this is a benign loss?

True, dma_map_sgtable() will return -EINVAL rather than -ENOMEM for 
failure. A quick look through other .map_dma_buf callbacks suggests 
they're returning a motley mix of error values and NULL for failure 
cases, so I'd imagine that importers shouldn't be too sensitive to the 
exact value.

Robin.

> 
> M
> 
>> +	ret = dma_map_sgtable(attachment->dev, st, dir,
>> DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
>> +	if (ret)
>> 		goto err_free_sg;
>> -	}
>>
>> 	return st;
>>
>> @@ -73,9 +70,7 @@ static void i915_gem_unmap_dma_buf(struct
>> dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
>> {
>> 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = dma_buf_to_obj(attachment-
>>> dmabuf);
>>
>> -	dma_unmap_sg_attrs(attachment->dev,
>> -			   sg->sgl, sg->nents, dir,
>> -			   DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
>> +	dma_unmap_sgtable(attachment->dev, sg, dir,
>> DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
>> 	sg_free_table(sg);
>> 	kfree(sg);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/mock_dmabuf.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/mock_dmabuf.c
>> index debaf7b18ab5..be30b27e2926 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/mock_dmabuf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/mock_dmabuf.c
>> @@ -28,10 +28,9 @@ static struct sg_table *mock_map_dma_buf(struct
>> dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
>> 		sg = sg_next(sg);
>> 	}
>>
>> -	if (!dma_map_sg(attachment->dev, st->sgl, st->nents, dir)) {
>> -		err = -ENOMEM;
>> +	err = dma_map_sgtable(attachment->dev, st, dir, 0);
>> +	if (err)
>> 		goto err_st;
>> -	}
>>
>> 	return st;
>>
>> @@ -46,7 +45,7 @@ static void mock_unmap_dma_buf(struct
>> dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
>> 			       struct sg_table *st,
>> 			       enum dma_data_direction dir)
>> {
>> -	dma_unmap_sg(attachment->dev, st->sgl, st->nents, dir);
>> +	dma_unmap_sgtable(attachment->dev, st, dir, 0);
>> 	sg_free_table(st);
>> 	kfree(st);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx