Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751086AbWEZQek (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 12:34:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751099AbWEZQdy (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 12:33:54 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]:807 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751065AbWEZQd0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 12:33:26 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=p5PvP43YKmxrt/Fw2c+pTD7So0iaf6ziiuK99CP8kXBQvWBEolOf19slQ6GX4e1ooOVLDjvDPvlTRd0y/t6jbFUC4wRW7QacL0FEjyc6hRdlnUOUW+V2/7IU5vrljoVpC/P8WGnVbl/I38GSeLVO/T5/2FHncm9nIMRP7FWuh/k= Message-ID: <44772D99.2070001@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 19:32:25 +0300 From: Anssi Hannula User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-7.5.20060mdk (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: dtor_core@ameritech.net, linux-joystick@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 03/11] input: new force feedback interface References: <20060515211229.521198000@gmail.com> <20060515211506.783939000@gmail.com> <20060517222007.2b606b1b.akpm@osdl.org> <4471E259.7080609@gmail.com> <4474392F.1030809@gmail.com> <20060524174910.5b066ee5.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060524174910.5b066ee5.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1315 Lines: 38 Andrew Morton wrote: > Anssi Hannula wrote: > >>>BTW, what is the best way to send corrected patches for this patchset? >>>Probably as a reply to the individual patches? >>> >> >>Hmm, I think it is easier to just send the whole updated set... >> >>I'm going to do all the changes discussed and then send the set probably >>tomorrow or in the weekend. >> > > Yes, that's fine. Once patches have matured a bit, incremental (and > fine-grained) updates are preferred. And I'll often turn > wholesale-replacement-attempts into incremental updates, so we can see what > changed. > > But at this stage, rip-it-out-and-redo is fine. Although it does help if > you can tell us which of the review comments were and were not implemented, > so we don't have to re-read the whole thing with the same level of > attention. Okay, I sent the whole set again. I hope you have time to take a look :) (didn't CC the patches for you because quilt sends them through my ISP with @gmail.com => smpt.osdl.org would've not accepted them) -- Anssi Hannula - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/