Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp159320pxk; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 17:54:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQjqS+sn8vCkVbHgqd5q09Hllatu/7+J6SXi+OiNe8l/owRPaZjnksCyVFUkJbNUicdPlg X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7cb:: with SMTP id m11mr782418ejc.41.1599094442134; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 17:54:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599094442; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=f+aupcEl/cy/1Mia7FT7iqlWAEmx36rEGkAxA5IGfe0xpUsOq3UCzBlQu+O8v28AzQ 8jOrlT3OM2kxwF+NkKe4DlN+i/M0sGPyXyjvQ6yBYSQ/Nb/5hm7taXCOesEPTe3k1wZF 0zOGARn7NkFI2ukA9U1J1CXlh2TjLeFgQ+OgE1k92h3jZRM2bi54REhzuaF0qlmMpAkm 7YHQWehKyI7cAr9rMjR7JSCcdSSQEeR6doKp4YGoieb6RTcvgM/+vMDqn6Fahh5IXEyh oZuV29r/xdGfRdsNx5Ytl9OUTnPuc+K9Wf9zJRa46lulmuh5DBqx0EjmsWiKM1gKDl3h 63yQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=OujEvT2rrMX1Ii/19skN3LPWE97WsoxYvGEb/uFKdUM=; b=vM7KdOs8yiz4TmI7R81Jvrz/u1W+fMJbtlW9KSN1a8orwRjZE7aa9suV4au+WedpZR LZ5FOemkSpl6rDyPFsakeOCsQ7rA7qso3sCAXYevk4sYJdWhw9Yk98BZNw4oBRk93sky IkzPWzpkTGEBCh2OK53KMOFDBVoD+lUUfMgRMDIym2Fp/ertCzjk0bazKYkHz8+de7/2 1eflhxr3B8o/LwLjTPATQjFeeVY+Su4MBCjFkNcfLvoMVBaE0KthTIvxhRE5UdBcyylc qkQplumItrcUCqBdRiOb8BPT3Sff6dp14Xh9qXm3IYGyXgpRHMckEBdAuR2v7YVeeNoV b+tw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v24si698620ejj.497.2020.09.02.17.53.37; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 17:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726936AbgICAws (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 2 Sep 2020 20:52:48 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:3119 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726586AbgICAwr (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Sep 2020 20:52:47 -0400 IronPort-SDR: qGDlemQJ5qO3Olpqvg138xEO7okIgIE5t/tv2JQEkM0Csm5jhSvAu/d+z05QTrPKx6wpQBZXHQ bzDwCZwAnU7w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9732"; a="219054318" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,384,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="219054318" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Sep 2020 17:52:46 -0700 IronPort-SDR: fR6rsbbP0eppyoZf/XqS7rhZqUYoZaA+iUqv5V1/UsAEJi2YONAezYMoj5ggx5wRzWrxCQ8LHM M38a9bbskKRw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,384,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="326007452" Received: from hongjunt-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.210.138]) ([10.254.210.138]) by fmsmga004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Sep 2020 17:52:43 -0700 Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/2] KVM: VMX: Enable bus lock VM exit To: Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: Chenyi Qiang , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel References: <20200817014459.28782-1-chenyi.qiang@intel.com> <20200817014459.28782-3-chenyi.qiang@intel.com> <87sgc1x4yn.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20200902224405.GK11695@sjchrist-ice> From: Xiaoyao Li Message-ID: <2e12df9d-4d56-d6c2-3470-9c990ab722c5@intel.com> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:52:41 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200902224405.GK11695@sjchrist-ice> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/3/2020 6:44 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:43:12AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >>> @@ -6809,6 +6824,19 @@ static fastpath_t vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> if (unlikely(vmx->exit_reason.failed_vmentry)) >>> return EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE; >>> >>> + /* >>> + * check the exit_reason to see if there is a bus lock >>> + * happened in guest. >>> + */ >>> + if (kvm_bus_lock_exit_enabled(vmx->vcpu.kvm)) { >>> + if (vmx->exit_reason.bus_lock_detected) { >>> + vcpu->stat.bus_locks++; > > Why bother with stats? Every bus lock exits to userspace, having quick > stats doesn't seem all that interesting. OK. We will remove it. >>> + vcpu->arch.bus_lock_detected = true; >>> + } else { >>> + vcpu->arch.bus_lock_detected = false; >> >> This is a fast path so I'm wondering if we can move bus_lock_detected >> clearing somewhere else. > > Why even snapshot vmx->exit_reason.bus_lock_detected? I don't see any > reason why vcpu_enter_guest() needs to handle the exit to userspace, e.g. > it's just as easily handled in VMX code. Because we want to handle the exit to userspace only in one place, i.e., after kvm_x86_ops.handle_exit(vcpu, exit_fastpath). Otherwise, we would have to check vmx->exit_reason.bus_lock_detected in every other handler, at least in those can preempt the bus lock VM-exit theoretically. >> >>> + } >>> + } >>> + >>> vmx->loaded_vmcs->launched = 1; >>> vmx->idt_vectoring_info = vmcs_read32(IDT_VECTORING_INFO_FIELD); >>> >>> @@ -8060,6 +8088,9 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void) >>> kvm_tsc_scaling_ratio_frac_bits = 48; >>> } >>> >>> + if (cpu_has_vmx_bus_lock_detection()) >>> + kvm_has_bus_lock_exit = true; >>> + >>> set_bit(0, vmx_vpid_bitmap); /* 0 is reserved for host */ >>> >>> if (enable_ept) > > ... > >>> @@ -4990,6 +4996,12 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm, >>> kvm->arch.exception_payload_enabled = cap->args[0]; >>> r = 0; >>> break; >>> + case KVM_CAP_X86_BUS_LOCK_EXIT: >>> + if (!kvm_has_bus_lock_exit) >>> + return -EINVAL; >> >> ... because userspace can check for -EINVAL when enabling the cap. Or we >> can return e.g. -EOPNOTSUPP here. I don't have a strong opinion on the matter.. >> >>> + kvm->arch.bus_lock_exit = cap->args[0]; > > Assuming we even want to make this per-VM, I think it'd make sense to make > args[0] a bit mask, e.g. to provide "off" and "exit" (this behavior) while > allowing for future modes, e.g. log-only. Good idea, will do it in next version. >>> + r = 0; >>> + break; >>> default: >>> r = -EINVAL; >>> break; >>> @@ -7732,12 +7744,23 @@ static void post_kvm_run_save(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)