Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] Common protected-clocks implementation
Date:   Wed,  2 Sep 2020 23:00:13 -0500
Message-Id: <20200903040015.5627-1-samuel@sholland.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Stephen, Maxime,

You previously asked me to implement the protected-clocks property in a
driver-independent way:

https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg753832.html

I provided an implementation 6 months ago, which I am resending now:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11398629/

Do you have any comments on it?

Thanks,
Samuel

Samuel Holland (2):
  clk: Implement protected-clocks for all OF clock providers
  Revert "clk: qcom: Support 'protected-clocks' property"

 drivers/clk/clk-conf.c    | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/clk.c         | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/clk.h         |  2 ++
 drivers/clk/qcom/common.c | 18 -------------
 4 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
2.26.2