Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932778AbWEZXf0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 19:35:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932779AbWEZXf0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 19:35:26 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]:31210 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932778AbWEZXf0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2006 19:35:26 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pQQGYSV0kMERJdyNQSLIvs7wVey1f9p95SyTV4dS3vMFygFGBLWG91n47J3hz4f8T0Y1htm6JhlmGd1g+EDdvyQ1Kzp2Fde0O+R4aorDy1jd6a9bacK8DnMLDT0QQ/3azWojZHuAknFVVP3U1Oy6Yyk/X0A+JEmr77BfECJ1sQc= Message-ID: <447790BB.4060707@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 02:35:23 +0300 From: Anssi Hannula User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-7.5.20060mdk (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: dtor_core@ameritech.net, linux-joystick@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 03/13] input: make input a multi-object module References: <20060526161129.557416000@gmail.com> <20060526162902.227348000@gmail.com> <20060526141603.054f0459.akpm@osdl.org> <44777340.7030905@gmail.com> <20060526144309.60469bcd.akpm@osdl.org> <447778DA.8080507@gmail.com> <20060526150804.0ae11b1f.akpm@osdl.org> <44777F98.4080004@gmail.com> <20060526153246.267991ed.akpm@osdl.org> <44778A14.4060500@gmail.com> <20060526162842.4da6b447.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060526162842.4da6b447.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 868 Lines: 26 Andrew Morton wrote: > Anssi Hannula wrote: > >>Unless you have any more thoughts, I'll make patches for (1) separate >>input-ff.o from input.o so that input.c renaming is not required, and to >>(2) use the input_dev->event() handler instead of input.o calling >>input-ff.o. > > > Sounds good, thanks. Hmh, I guess I need to send the modified "input: new force feedback interface" patch fully again, as the previous patch patches input-core.c that doesn't exist if we drop the rename. A final minor question: In your opinion is input-ff.c or ff-effects.c a better name? ;) -- Anssi Hannula - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/