Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 3 Sep 2020 16:58:09 +0200
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>,
        Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] pidfd: support PIDFD_NONBLOCK in pidfd_open()
Message-ID: <20200903145808.GK4386@redhat.com>
References: <20200902102130.147672-1-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
 <20200902102130.147672-2-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200902102130.147672-2-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Christian, off-topic question...

On 09/02, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> -static int pidfd_create(struct pid *pid)
> +static int pidfd_create(struct pid *pid, unsigned int flags)
>  {
>  	int fd;
>
>  	fd = anon_inode_getfd("[pidfd]", &pidfd_fops, get_pid(pid),
> -			      O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);
> +			      flags | O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);

I just noticed this comment above pidfd_create:

	 * Note, that this function can only be called after the fd table has
	 * been unshared to avoid leaking the pidfd to the new process.

what does it mean?

Of course, if fd table is shared then pidfd can "leak" to another process,
but this is true for any file and sys_pidfd_open() doesn't do any check?


In fact I think this helper buys nothing but adds the unnecessary get/put_pid,
we can kill it and change pidfd_open() to do

	SYSCALL_DEFINE2(pidfd_open, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, flags)
	{
		int fd;
		struct pid *p;

		if (flags & ~PIDFD_NONBLOCK)
			return -EINVAL;

		if (pid <= 0)
			return -EINVAL;

		p = find_get_pid(pid);
		if (!p)
			return -ESRCH;

		fd = -EINVAL;
		if (pid_has_task(p, PIDTYPE_TGID)) {
			fd = anon_inode_getfd("[pidfd]", &pidfd_fops, pid,
						flags | O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);
		}
		if (fd < 0)
			put_pid(p);
		return fd;
	}

but this is cosmetic and off-topic too.

Oleg.