Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp619064pxk; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:23:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDQcd2fGinAB1PrEVNN4olqmqpzgN2KO1wEIQvumWJLGyrkhc7CngW6HLM5GDY24AbrkF7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8559:: with SMTP id h25mr2633914ejy.536.1599146603401; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 08:23:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599146603; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Js05jym967aYHOU3A2gySubkS53hhUvwcmqMiQXbHYWIE5rjxxGKuBNEQSMbOx9koq x56rXtdaTyF/tJyGZJtqmrbwIQ8MQpiv66l+EmPRw8WIbTgIZzzWMgK9kI7jbjg66JQ/ 9D/ZXfuGRo6Cn4doIYmAFJPBDMCQBkc5mZhCr5NJkeZPXpSpYDdCjoELusNIWreAJY25 AqhxeFSpEr1inR4BM8XxXCLvTuhVttAwFn3mGLLmF4rn4ObnSOxMjW4PspuSSRZshhMn Iq/jRXo/nFpjkVFHSIhsY9kjOI9iMXPSnxoyOo/0wSD5RI9gMTjRoHVBAh0lesoHG+F5 aQkQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject:dkim-signature; bh=0HzlZIPywbFcx466Q8/W+zmFpS4jLc5rFIES8a+z/v4=; b=Ar887I+Nr51ppXDgLeqRwkEONpFnTg+JhDmi52ZjxrlvUsgdKtBFYBsM/39jWyC5HA XKuB8QdA5x9uaEtwxM5/SNzKeTu5yG9tLHiVhIGOsCh9QE+KPegZWh1obCgTX2jzNqIr xt8HUB7bdEzU3UOyTcbEQwyNjMoVM6QSvixVf2z6m2HC3KaeWZjf9ecisUf0wLa7On0X WrEK+JBF19pOBtRQBe+cUblR8VenaPmr01a4RCzo3oC+xQ4XIZ5Pm8LA20LoBxHiv7zz USx+8zeVfmMF+9Le9o2h/cpxDar8jNlqpIBmj0xGC+XmFYs40jB6fP5tZr8Y69R6Mp9y AULQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="eXzV6ZK/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si2342341ejg.482.2020.09.03.08.22.59; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 08:23:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="eXzV6ZK/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728612AbgICPW0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:22:26 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:50197 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729112AbgICPWU (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:22:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1599146538; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0HzlZIPywbFcx466Q8/W+zmFpS4jLc5rFIES8a+z/v4=; b=eXzV6ZK/CMYhx5eVt5KC7RuDRk82uqQEkEj70vPD30bpiAtTnLCplhsE3B8xyDJitZHRbr ZMwzJipnHPO5/q3pCWyfM7durPOeUoR3lBHy31txx9VD3lUjqo3ht0EMUAFXpg6Kc/brqd PCH8RmVPB8b+dnBJsludbg66iyjS23Y= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-215-98tZJrasMY29zEJNBUFsDw-1; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 11:22:09 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 98tZJrasMY29zEJNBUFsDw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2201425DA; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.112.51] (ovpn-112-51.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.51]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A7887EEC4; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] vfio/fsl-mc: Implement VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO ioctl call From: Auger Eric To: Diana Craciun , alex.williamson@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bharatb.linux@gmail.com, laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com, Bharat Bhushan References: <20200826093315.5279-1-diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com> <20200826093315.5279-5-diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com> Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 17:22:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Diana, On 9/3/20 5:16 PM, Auger Eric wrote: > Hi Diana, > > On 8/26/20 11:33 AM, Diana Craciun wrote: >> Expose to userspace information about the memory regions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan >> Signed-off-by: Diana Craciun >> --- >> drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++- >> drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h | 19 ++++++ >> 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c >> index 5a5460d01f00..093b8d68496c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c >> +++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c >> @@ -17,16 +17,72 @@ >> >> static struct fsl_mc_driver vfio_fsl_mc_driver; >> >> +static int vfio_fsl_mc_regions_init(struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev) >> +{ >> + struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev = vdev->mc_dev; >> + int count = mc_dev->obj_desc.region_count; >> + int i; >> + >> + vdev->regions = kcalloc(count, sizeof(struct vfio_fsl_mc_region), >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!vdev->regions) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { >> + struct resource *res = &mc_dev->regions[i]; >> + >> + vdev->regions[i].addr = res->start; >> + vdev->regions[i].size = resource_size(res); >> + vdev->regions[i].flags = 0; > why 0? I see in >> + } >> + >> + vdev->num_regions = mc_dev->obj_desc.region_count; > nit: you can use count directly fsl-mc-bus.c that flags can take > meaningful values Sorry I missed flags and types. So you may set the type in this patch instead of in next patch? vdev->regions[i].type = mc_dev->regions[i].flags & IORESOURCE_BITS; Eric >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static void vfio_fsl_mc_regions_cleanup(struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev) >> +{ >> + vdev->num_regions = 0; >> + kfree(vdev->regions); >> +} >> + >> static int vfio_fsl_mc_open(void *device_data) >> { >> + struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev = device_data; >> + int ret; >> + >> if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) >> return -ENODEV; >> >> + mutex_lock(&vdev->driver_lock); >> + if (!vdev->refcnt) { >> + ret = vfio_fsl_mc_regions_init(vdev); >> + if (ret) >> + goto err_reg_init; >> + } >> + vdev->refcnt++; >> + >> + mutex_unlock(&vdev->driver_lock); >> + >> return 0; >> + >> +err_reg_init: >> + mutex_unlock(&vdev->driver_lock); >> + module_put(THIS_MODULE); >> + return ret; >> } >> >> static void vfio_fsl_mc_release(void *device_data) >> { >> + struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev = device_data; >> + >> + mutex_lock(&vdev->driver_lock); >> + >> + if (!(--vdev->refcnt)) >> + vfio_fsl_mc_regions_cleanup(vdev); >> + >> + mutex_unlock(&vdev->driver_lock); >> + >> module_put(THIS_MODULE); >> } >> >> @@ -59,7 +115,25 @@ static long vfio_fsl_mc_ioctl(void *device_data, unsigned int cmd, >> } >> case VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO: >> { >> - return -ENOTTY; >> + struct vfio_region_info info; >> + >> + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_region_info, offset); >> + >> + if (copy_from_user(&info, (void __user *)arg, minsz)) >> + return -EFAULT; >> + >> + if (info.argsz < minsz) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + if (info.index >= vdev->num_regions) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + /* map offset to the physical address */ >> + info.offset = VFIO_FSL_MC_INDEX_TO_OFFSET(info.index); >> + info.size = vdev->regions[info.index].size; >> + info.flags = vdev->regions[info.index].flags; >> + >> + return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &info, minsz); >> } >> case VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO: >> { >> @@ -204,6 +278,7 @@ static int vfio_fsl_mc_probe(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev) >> vfio_iommu_group_put(group, dev); >> return ret; >> } >> + mutex_init(&vdev->driver_lock); >> >> return ret; >> } >> @@ -227,6 +302,8 @@ static int vfio_fsl_mc_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev) >> >> mc_dev->mc_io = NULL; >> >> + mutex_destroy(&vdev->driver_lock); >> + >> vfio_iommu_group_put(mc_dev->dev.iommu_group, dev); >> >> return 0; >> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h >> index 37d61eaa58c8..818dfd3df4db 100644 >> --- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h >> +++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h >> @@ -7,9 +7,28 @@ >> #ifndef VFIO_FSL_MC_PRIVATE_H >> #define VFIO_FSL_MC_PRIVATE_H >> >> +#define VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_SHIFT 40 >> +#define VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_MASK (((u64)(1) << VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_SHIFT) - 1) >> + >> +#define VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_TO_INDEX(off) ((off) >> VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_SHIFT) >> + >> +#define VFIO_FSL_MC_INDEX_TO_OFFSET(index) \ >> + ((u64)(index) << VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_SHIFT) >> + >> +struct vfio_fsl_mc_region { >> + u32 flags; >> + u32 type; >> + u64 addr; >> + resource_size_t size; >> +}; >> + >> struct vfio_fsl_mc_device { >> struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev; >> struct notifier_block nb; >> + int refcnt; >> + u32 num_regions; >> + struct vfio_fsl_mc_region *regions; >> + struct mutex driver_lock; >> }; >> >> #endif /* VFIO_FSL_MC_PRIVATE_H */ >> > Otherwise looks good to me > > Thanks > > Eric >