Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200903142242.925828-1-hch@lst.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200903142242.925828-1-hch@lst.de>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:49:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh=jtTcwSox8RY-skN83c40WXZOfwid-91FDgRdk0xwrw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: remove the last set_fs() in common code, and remove it for x86
 and powerpc v3
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 7:22 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> [Note to Linus: I'd like to get this into linux-next rather earlier
> than later.  Do you think it is ok to add this tree to linux-next?]

This whole series looks really good to me now, with each patch looking
like a clear cleanup on its own.

So ack on the whole series, and yes, please get this into linux-next
and ready for 5.10. Whether through Al or something else.

Thanks,

               Linus