Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200831082917.17117-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
 <20200831082917.17117-6-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20200903162550.GA2896127@bogus>
In-Reply-To: <20200903162550.GA2896127@bogus>
From:   Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Sep 2020 22:17:05 +0530
Message-ID: <CAMty3ZCXV9=VzVKiKJ740RcR+uYA7CHUzjrDL0vwQ1NOw9n4FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Engicam PX30.Core
 C.TOUCH 2.0
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>,
        linux-amarula <linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Suniel Mahesh <sunil@amarulasolutions.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 9:55 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 13:59:15 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > PX30.Core is an EDIMM SOM based on Rockchip PX30 from Engicam.
> >
> > C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive
> > touch interface support.
> >
> > PX30.Core needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for creating
> > complete PX30.Core C.TOUCH 2.0 board.
> >
> > Add bindings for it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> > ---
> > Changes for v3:
> > - none
> > Changes for v2:
> > - new patch
> >
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
>
>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Yes, it's on purpose. The previous binding was about C.TOUCH with LVDS
board and this one is C.TOUCH carrier only. ie the main reason I have
not included. I did mention in the cover-letter saying previous one
dropped and the C.TOUCH carrier added.

Hope this answers your query.

Jagan.