Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To:     Haiwei Li <lihaiwei.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc:     "hpa\@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>, "bp\@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
        "mingo\@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "tglx\@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>, joro@8bytes.org,
        "jmattson\@google.com" <jmattson@google.com>,
        "wanpengli\@tencent.com" <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        sean.j.christopherson@intel.com,
        "pbonzini\@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kvm\@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "x86\@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Add tracepoint for cr_interception
In-Reply-To: <f3031602-db3b-c4fe-b719-d402663b0a2b@gmail.com>
References: <f3031602-db3b-c4fe-b719-d402663b0a2b@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:01:12 +0200
Message-ID: <87imctoinr.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Haiwei Li <lihaiwei.kernel@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Haiwei Li <lihaiwei@tencent.com>
>
> Add trace_kvm_cr_write and trace_kvm_cr_read for svm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haiwei Li <lihaiwei@tencent.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 03dd7bac8034..2c6dea48ba62 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -2261,6 +2261,7 @@ static int cr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)

There are two special cases when we go to emulate_on_interception() and
these won't be logged but I don't think this is a must.

>   	if (cr >= 16) { /* mov to cr */
>   		cr -= 16;
>   		val = kvm_register_read(&svm->vcpu, reg);
> +		trace_kvm_cr_write(cr, val);
>   		switch (cr) {
>   		case 0:
>   			if (!check_selective_cr0_intercepted(svm, val))
> @@ -2306,6 +2307,7 @@ static int cr_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>   			return 1;
>   		}
>   		kvm_register_write(&svm->vcpu, reg, val);
> +		trace_kvm_cr_read(cr, val);

The 'default:' case above does 'return 1;' so we won't get the trace but
I understand you put trace_kvm_cr_read() here so you can log the
returned 'val', #UD should be clearly visible. 

>   	}
>   	return kvm_complete_insn_gp(&svm->vcpu, err);
>   }
> --
> 2.18.4
>

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

-- 
Vitaly