Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:35:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:35:02 -0500 Received: from hsregn1-22.sk.sympatico.ca ([142.165.128.22]:46353 "HELO bruce-guenter.dyndns.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:34:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:34:44 -0600 From: Bruce Guenter To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] Wild thangs, was: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue Message-ID: <20001113103444.A6392@em.ca> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3A0C427A.E015E58A@timpanogas.org> <20001110095227.A15010@sendmail.com> <3A0C37FF.23D7B69@timpanogas.org> <20001110101138.A15087@sendmail.com> <3A0C3F30.F5EB076E@timpanogas.org> <20001110133431.A16169@sendmail.com> <3A0C6B7C.110902B4@timpanogas.org> <3A0C6E01.EFA10590@timpanogas.org> <3A0C929B.EE6F7137@linux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3A0C929B.EE6F7137@linux.com>; from david@linux.com on Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 04:28:11PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 04:28:11PM -0800, David Ford wrote: > Some wild blatherings about sendmail... Warning: the following will likely be seen by some as flamebait. I've long ago divorced myself from sendmail to save my own sanity. > - Uses lots of memory to send a big file. > Incorrect. I just verified it with a 10 meg file which became a 14 m= eg attachment. > Sendmail consumed an additional 5 megs combined while handling the input = and output v.s. > an idle daemon. Idle is 1.8M, recv was 4.0M, send was 2.3M, no measure o= n the remote > side. I sent it via pine to a remote address. As opposed to modern mail servers which can send messages of any size using constant sized small (well under 1M) processes. > - Requires high load average allowance > Incorrect. Same machine barely spiked a tenth of a point for this lo= ad and dropped > back to .05. You saw load while sending a single file? Modern mail servers can send without generating significant load (unless your server was a 386). I've used older Pentium boxes that could send 60 messages at a time without hitting .1 load. Anyways, this is rather off topic for linux-kernel. --=20 Bruce Guenter http://em.ca/~bruceg/ --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6EBgk6W+y3GmZgOgRAha7AJwIyKiuggWmgew5YLcYNMN5iyxnPQCeILbd kvKPGkngbUGxWakzfV04sHw= =Fr0z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/