Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 5 Sep 2020 15:57:14 +0200
From:   Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
To:     Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
        openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] openrisc: Fix issue with get_user for 64-bit
 values
Message-ID: <20200905135714.74bsr5h423k7guw4@ltop.local>
References: <20200905131935.972386-1-shorne@gmail.com>
 <20200905131935.972386-4-shorne@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200905131935.972386-4-shorne@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 10:19:35PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:

Hi,

The change for 64-bit get_user() looks good to me.
But I wonder, given that openrisc is big-endian, what will happen
you have the opposite situation:
	u32 *ptr;
	u64 val;
	...
	get_user(val, ptr);

Won't you end with the value in the most significant part of
the register pair?

-- Luc