Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 5 Sep 2020 10:34:58 -0500
From:   Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/16] 5.4.63-rc1 review
Message-ID: <20200905153458.hdamqfp6eq4oyeq6@nuc.therub.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net
References: <20200904120257.203708503@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20200904120257.203708503@linuxfoundation.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 03:29:53PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.63 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Sorry for the delay - we are short handed this weekend and I got
confused looking at results yesterday and thought we had a systems
problem. In fact, the problem was that tags/releases weren't pushed to
stable-rc which split-brains our results and I just forgot about that
possibility. Is it possible on your side to automate updating the
stable-rc repo when you publish a stable release?


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>


Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 5.4.63-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.4.y
git commit: ef2051e79e05700a5c8814fe4d5b7a8a93503251
git describe: v5.4.61-231-gef2051e79e05
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.4-oe/build/v5.4.61-231-gef2051e79e05

No regressions (compared to build v5.4.61)

No fixes (compared to build v5.4.61)

Ran 34712 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- nxp-ls2088
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan

Test Suites
-----------
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* v4l2-compliance
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* igt-gpu-tools

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org