Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp3104507pxk; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 03:23:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAasqGYcCKs6RVXT5LPlB3SW1F3JKHYKHfezg4/XJgCvKqCCNVwY+UHbcLYw0KkZjFNVD2 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cb83:: with SMTP id r3mr20389749edt.35.1599474211540; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 03:23:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599474211; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EhYq7xGZC2Bzmvxqn9VmdrWyxiPS6AodYa4YAW1gnFen4D6LWE/hByrQs+R2sG16cO jOhe8BOt5xHYOtVvJbfe1+WrvDPnrTFFQ4kwBymrKn0Do8IWjGp9Xm6uFsYKZ58UFT2x 4Ca1pBdGItzN9l/ToJ9tEkHuJfu5V37gsz9rgvy3SiWgsBtbnrN/msGmU0qqmG+SJ7sh QOV3ikzGNa8nHSijqEszzizwCMUEHi7wgee0mxlg6+JqndAcWZSMWT7ZWv7sWUALFEG1 vs8CT3Lal/IoHM7x0joxa15l0DvDmKbX2g/7KzdNf+LBUNq/FO6JzUis9/kzSWiyL0bm 502g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=DlZMhc8hmWDX2ZWHISagSA2inr2CmIbaM90rLlkkX2Y=; b=RVy+G2cDrZDkwzzUbDBPJLdYpRRnZo9TEC58Pe3Oobz+WMw9VM5igyxzIkLrLlVIuB +omLzmNEzFc39h98+OLtKaGH9hyBb0asqY8vc6o86gc7LopsddaGJwduCzucrEI8zlAN g/lSDgE8yJKdvoFQaUWBvj8iKeEgqkKo45D9+Ao2W7NRYTL3/d5x+IbJk0ezhtkYxW88 6Bbh5xDAHf/7cOaWPDLye0i9Jago+anLPz7Hz6F/xX+BcFrJIRpvNjF6zdV/7VWUbE9S Pkj21VaR43mQ957P+S7mJN9uRrtZnmVdiEwTfLFAuhwIqHr0IeSwRzGUtEJbCSYZC9TS YrFQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=z4FKmT75; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qc14si10327750ejb.8.2020.09.07.03.23.09; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 03:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=z4FKmT75; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728791AbgIGKWQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 06:22:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33114 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728986AbgIGKVz (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 06:21:55 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1043.google.com (mail-pj1-x1043.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1043]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA2DAC061573 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 03:21:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1043.google.com with SMTP id b16so6531141pjp.0 for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 03:21:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DlZMhc8hmWDX2ZWHISagSA2inr2CmIbaM90rLlkkX2Y=; b=z4FKmT751iwYNJDVxUHuh97VQixOoKqshuVLVSk+A66nwKitSyLHJHdlsOrueqQ9xZ CrtM4r5aXM8/jnhXkOv5DZ2iB0654KyAgU+sLOb8JllNfE9PWGkHTqOi9TVswABW9NI0 qijj1z8rRtSjFbvxtcF++oL4Ce/HqJ+jpVoS96UgtiXoPBwS0Q4cqetFSJcJnNu46W5q qT8ewTf0WSVfNPuuiavDKzpD5xNHE9PVgnJCUYeFXiyfM9dTr1BvL5FyhchNDVYKYdTu kvXxkOLGP92pkE5vpjy30sc3HXoyzYZdo8BwY6uTICTrrm8acD4PbwXbT5cHwrksoxE3 ccqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DlZMhc8hmWDX2ZWHISagSA2inr2CmIbaM90rLlkkX2Y=; b=fnAfhxTYa2q61xM72iK2T4Zg46EtWcflL29VkCe1DfgsgVoOpJc++nkV46R3I/gvk4 +US09ub0J/GVk+biwV9NFF9473LePE8346m7Mgv8n5SRPhtVvHkqGrWHccAo2ZZe+bHe f+L9vgs2R4iTwzj2bzr7ysDLWjZtzSONVl9Mg0kKuL9te2vKFwELNAW7VVqrdtCETaRV thDjJt7xHFbvPX99aWajSVq0KPmFWCukfDlH5wlhTJjY2I8GdDJL6UHffqpVyc9r+a3Y R2nGWA4Br1NiytJXAVH0JippZrCg/TTi5wJbXOFM/ZF9p7zhjAnsjufh4Mq8s7bebJP9 dpfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306qpgnZG7sPE88aBlz0ygulL4IHxJ7TlJoc1tJAGhoUgyWMX46 Vd2TnIjlub6SHSmfQ6I962rzhKPJp5y2mn0eAHM8Yg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d596:: with SMTP id v22mr7666482pju.146.1599474114280; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 03:21:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200904155025.55718-1-xypron.glpk@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: From: Maxim Uvarov Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:21:43 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] efi/libstub: DRAM base calculation To: Heinrich Schuchardt Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Ingo Molnar , Arvind Sankar , linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jens Wiklander , Ilias Apalodimas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 11:31, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On 07.09.20 09:00, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 18:50, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > >> > >> In the memory map the regions with the lowest addresses may be of type > >> EFI_RESERVED_TYPE. The reserved areas may be discontinuous relative to the > >> rest of the memory. So for calculating the maximum loading address for the > >> device tree and the initial ramdisk image these reserved areas should not > >> be taken into account. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt > >> --- > >> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub.c | 3 ++- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub.c > >> index c2484bf75c5d..13058ac75765 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub.c > >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub.c > >> @@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ static unsigned long get_dram_base(void) > >> map.map_end = map.map + map_size; > >> > >> for_each_efi_memory_desc_in_map(&map, md) { > >> - if (md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB) { > >> + if (md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB && > >> + md->type != EFI_RESERVED_TYPE) { > > > > shouldn't the type here be CONVENTIONAL? > > In 32bit ARM reserve_kernel_base() the following are considered: > > * EFI_LOADER_CODE > * EFI_LOADER_DATA > * EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE > * EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA > * EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY > > What I have not yet fully understood is why Linux on ARM 32bit tries to > put the kernel into the first 128 MiB. Cf. handle_kernel_image() in > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm32-stub.c. > Are you looking to the latest kernel? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm32-stub.c?h=v5.9-rc4#n211 efi_bs_call(allocate_pages,..) is only for EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY. > According to the comments this is due to some implementation detail in > the Linux zImage decompressor and not required by UEFI or the hardware: > > Verify that the DRAM base address is compatible with the ARM > boot protocol, which determines the base of DRAM by masking > off the low 27 bits of the address at which the zImage is > loaded. These assumptions are made by the decompressor, > before any memory map is available. I think that is also fixed with: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm32-stub.c?h=v5.9-rc4&id=d0f9ca9be11f25ef4151195eab7ea36d136084f6 Maxim. > > Best regards > > Heinrich > > > > >> if (membase > md->phys_addr) > >> membase = md->phys_addr; > >> } > >> -- > >> 2.28.0 > >> >