Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 07 Sep 2020 14:57:05 +0200
From:   Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?B?562U5aSNOg==?= [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/panel: Add Ilitek
 ILI9341 DBI panel driver
To:     Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        =?UTF-8?b?5L2V5bCP6b6Z?= <Leon.He@unisoc.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        Noralf Tronnes <noralf@tronnes.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, od@zcrc.me,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Message-Id: <5BHAGQ.KGFJ0K3OLEAO3@crapouillou.net>
In-Reply-To: <20200830202822.GA950472@ravnborg.org>
References: <20200822163250.63664-1-paul@crapouillou.net>
        <20200822163250.63664-7-paul@crapouillou.net>
        <edf38d68214247f486db3cc1f81ec404@shmbx04.spreadtrum.com>
        <COYVFQ.2IA7KFB6BF4C3@crapouillou.net>
        <20200830191133.GB6043@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
        <20200830202822.GA950472@ravnborg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


Le dim. 30 ao=FBt 2020 =E0 22:28, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> a=20
=E9crit :
> Hi Laurent.
>=20
>>  >
>>  > Please read the cover letter, it explains why it's done this way.=20
>> The
>>  > whole point of this patchset is to merge DSI and DBI frameworks=20
>> in a
>>  > way that can be maintained.
>>=20
>>  I think this proves the point that the proposed naming is=20
>> confusing. At
>>  least a rename would be required.
>=20
> Do you have any inputs on the amount of rename we are looking into.
> Is this a simple s/struct mipi_dsi_device/struct mipi_dxi_device/
> or something more?
>=20
> We should script the rename as it will tocuh a lot of files,
> and without a script we would chase this. But once it is scripted
> it would be trivial to perform.
>=20
> I did not look at this enough, but I had an idea that we
> would have do to a s/dsi/dxi/ in a lot of places.
>=20
> (dxi is my best proposal at the moment for something covering both dsi
> and dbi).

dcs?

Since DBI and DSI panels generally all use DCS commands.

-Paul