Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751218AbWE2GJ2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2006 02:09:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751225AbWE2GJ2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2006 02:09:28 -0400 Received: from smtp.enter.net ([216.193.128.24]:4104 "EHLO smtp.enter.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751218AbWE2GJ1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2006 02:09:27 -0400 From: "D. Hazelton" To: "Dave Airlie" Subject: Re: OpenGL-based framebuffer concepts Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 02:09:18 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: "Neil Brown" , "Jon Smirl" , "Pavel Machek" , "Alan Cox" , "Kyle Moffett" , "Manu Abraham" , "linux cbon" , "Helge Hafting" , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060519224056.37429.qmail@web26611.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <17530.32657.869302.621952@cse.unsw.edu.au> <21d7e9970605282214l3b3060cew9d55ddc55c4274dc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <21d7e9970605282214l3b3060cew9d55ddc55c4274dc@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605290209.19668.dhazelton@enter.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1495 Lines: 34 On Monday 29 May 2006 05:14, Dave Airlie wrote: > > And we really have no tie-breaker mechanism in the kernel - I know > > Linus is very loathe to play that role. Negotiation, compromise, and > > persistence are what is needed. > > > > I suspect that to make progress you will have to start out by doing > > something that you don't completely agree with. But that doesn't need > > to be a loss. It will be both a learning experience and a credibility > > earning exercise. > > > > Maybe if you are really genuine about putting effort into this we > > should see if something can be arranged to get you to the > > kernel-summit so that you, Jon, and Dave can yell at each other for a > > while and come to some understanding:-) > > We did this at last years Kernel Summit :-) > > When I state these views they are not all my own, they are the > aggregate of a number of developers who were at KS last year and a few > we've talked to since. I'd be willing to think about restoring a working code tree and starting over if you have notes and/or minutes of the KS discussion and any talks that have happened since. This way I can get a clear picture of exactly what people want done regardless of what I feel needs to be or should be done. DRH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/