Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200907161141.31034-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20200907161141.31034-3-krzk@kernel.org>
 <20200907173819.00005a48@Huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200907173819.00005a48@Huawei.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 7 Sep 2020 19:11:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPe0W_+hN=pk9F5O61w7riYuBhmK3=JvrYzDY8LU7xvH4A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] dt-bindings: iio: adc: exynos-adc: require second
 interrupt with touch screen
To:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc:     Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
        Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@live.ca>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Pawe=C5=82_Chmiel?= <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@gmail.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 18:39, Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon,  7 Sep 2020 18:11:18 +0200
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > The ADC in S3C/S5P/Exynos SoCs can be used also for handling touch
> > screen.  In such case the second interrupt is required.  This second
> > interrupt can be anyway provided, even without touch screens.  This
> > fixes dtbs_check warnings like:
> >
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aquila.dt.yaml: adc@e1700000: interrupts: [[23], [24]] is too long
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>
> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huwei.com>
>
> Or I can pick this up through the IIO tree if that makes sense.
> I doubt anything else will touch this binding this cycle, so either
> way works for me.

Let's wait for Rob's review and then if you could, please pick it up.

Best regards,
Krzysztof