Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
From:   Grant Grundler <grantgrundler@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Sep 2020 23:35:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP6odjjZAZ4fcAdoFETzbX0_e-VPsrvJ0Fh1_ZXfeAZKLppj3A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Apply from 2018? [V2,0/3] phy: qcom-ipq4019-usb: add new driver
To:     Alban Bedel <albeu@free.fr>, Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
        Matthew McClintock <mmcclint@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Alban, Andy,
Can you please apply this patch series from 2018 or please explain
what I (or John) have to do so this series can be applied?

   https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10552139/
   [V2,0/3] phy: qcom-ipq4019-usb: add new driver=EF=BF=BC

OpenWRT has been applying this code to all ipq4019 targets since Jul 2018:
    https://git.openwrt.org/?p=3Dopenwrt/openwrt.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;h=3D956=
72e04335ea0d7d8f468cec8f63d593cc6ede6

I expect if there were problems with it, we'd know by now.

$ find -name \*qcom-ipq4019-usb\*
./target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-5.4/076-phy-qcom-ipq4019-usb-add-driver-for-=
QCOM-IPQ4019.patch
./target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-5.4/075-dt-bindings-phy-qcom-ipq4019-usb-add=
-binding-documen.patch
./target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.19/076-phy-qcom-ipq4019-usb-add-driver-for=
-QCOM-IPQ4019.patch
./target/linux/ipq40xx/patches-4.19/075-dt-bindings-phy-qcom-ipq4019-usb-ad=
d-binding-documen.patch
...

In 2018, Rob Herring reviewed (and approved):
   [V2,1/3] dt-bindings: phy-qcom-ipq4019-usb: add binding document

I've just reviewed 2/3 and 3/3. You can add to those:
  Reviewed-by: Grant Grundler <grantgrundler@gmail.com>

I compared 3/3 with the DTS entries that were submitted (and I
approved) to chromeos-3.18 kernel tree in 2016:
   https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/337605
   https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/344471

While not identical, the important bits (reg values) are.

(I would reply to the original thread but I don't have it in a format
I can easily reply to.)

cheers,
grant