Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 08:55:21 +0200
From:   Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To:     Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com,
        jasowang@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
        david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, linuxram@us.ibm.com,
        hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Message-ID: <20200908085521.4db22680.cohuck@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200908003951.233e47f3.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
References: <1599471547-28631-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
        <20200908003951.233e47f3.pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Organization: Red Hat GmbH
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 00:39:51 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Mon,  7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200
> Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
> > to validate VIRTIO device features.  
> 
> Michael, is this going in via your tree?
> 

I believe Michael's tree is the right place for this, but I can also
queue it if I get an ack on patch 1.