Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp3747341pxk; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 01:02:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzo89+koVXmJhhIEqvd/BAFGp5yHTa4/up2019tUiFR6GbHy1AcsJuc/HWJjGnZvuLEmyuc X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:82d1:: with SMTP id a17mr24116903ejy.385.1599552161840; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 01:02:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599552161; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UlraGSvYEE8yiDrFs4KiGtPPUUa61ZjEeHbQPlTghWNF9hgJs3jzLfMYx2gbgTFiXx MWl+SESeluNzjEcO39Gr6xPEwR/hdWrtbhMTU0fJBGZoZkAsqY9zIj4w9fHk9+A0Ssus 09MRzZFU9xgvSZBmhJc7vmo8RYXYnr1yombk3X1jFBNGqGJemYOBhSmtEpPjCd/iIxwn nNZzYYYYiUBt2pAnjNd420Lqo0MlGIdW/RRaRomaNCYpq0b93Wy4CnEZMF1AF9m4bGpz jJrfSbV8nAk1W1c43gr8TrOVMWoETTTBAAI7mc+bGgG4ewXHPRlWAuICb1jgUoVD0/l+ HbXA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=hjajqtvEuISTBRgRpPMUCH8ji6lbeHsCmX5hSQj+D2Q=; b=OVAHHeJQh4yblUKhmlbMqMqxUaO0ulaT4HjcGZZYGzSonJbx35vnZikeQqo0JqgzrD +Q3tLMs3BimzcqVfHlt5EuEpGZnQFLKMLwDnzm21l3cYtBiTarmIDY7mCRlvMi4/sOiy 7uJ0u3AIKnGW43i6J+8Y3fZb2gOikIMkHGkFbOD0KliKGVhI10i2W3Ntp5v4siq+v0No pBv7axDIp/S0P0K7weytl2r7rXSj1WAUiyUtbz1EdJBUaGRQAtbcxu3VuC74wLbBAUZk BjtUYrp/I0RjjCHo4mb9RH3QEGegXqIdzrIHOWJqJ9EWaIDMj1nTdhTOzCHHyrGAyEpE HiWw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=HVFVXNTC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e11si2624563ejj.41.2020.09.08.01.02.19; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 01:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=HVFVXNTC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729466AbgIHH6N (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 8 Sep 2020 03:58:13 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:37955 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729915AbgIHH5t (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2020 03:57:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1599551860; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hjajqtvEuISTBRgRpPMUCH8ji6lbeHsCmX5hSQj+D2Q=; b=HVFVXNTCn0P8hxdzDQkceEZE95e+2L8CyHiJGAdMFWyTELNh0rCS64n0hyDoSvB+uoXlC2 as/CK00hPloi+JHHZowUZJFtc47cjpZlZoTF/Q3Touz780mZnTcffk1thObxcy6ig6S2fb O4I/8if0CXHx/UFEovyQOwhgHLa9o+Q= Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-198-7Xnsz1lqMomrMpHZXNA5Tw-1; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 03:57:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 7Xnsz1lqMomrMpHZXNA5Tw-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id l2so5838113ede.19 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:57:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=hjajqtvEuISTBRgRpPMUCH8ji6lbeHsCmX5hSQj+D2Q=; b=cQqy4lzol9nC4uKfWcOFGnLpn29/DfELVcYBjzgc603IsCWcsHleoEmP2+kn4PpUVv BZlU4JYr8umgB/eBEHv0KL5FnubLgKQ1GkF8EywEKCZNWF0VtxLoKOouQK/ndVtihHpQ ygbjP4fIMDWo+gkmlRsWirKawAjR5ZEKfUNCjqeL9EFSGCOr+l4lmz1r5hDHuqN6Krty Rofey4IsrPy5y1Vwr6ujoXz+Y0R8VMkidh2hn6+ciogF3aWzhsNI9slQV/SJ9dkJH3Zg Y7yzmNfz/cJc2eRAEG887/vEAY97uN2QFbIRSCwF1CaQA6RkjCKIjz7AM8wMAeLhtChu N9Xw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Vxe3joNiTR3PLM1r3SRVDxqZro+6dqPemSRZJCPIt2Rr4e6va fjAcSThm9OZEsvHeEVk0GBY2KPbvokBzMnZbCxPU/lHlQTl5zKXXV//bUhoSi90AHzB6EdQ7PN1 UwmkCVP5UsLhOtjuGHDt7M9L5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4cc6:: with SMTP id q6mr17306533ejt.201.1599551857520; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:57:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4cc6:: with SMTP id q6mr17306516ejt.201.1599551857341; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([147.161.9.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e4sm16024501edk.38.2020.09.08.00.57.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 03:57:30 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Halil Pasic Cc: Pierre Morel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, jasowang@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, linuxram@us.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features Message-ID: <20200908035506-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1599471547-28631-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <20200908003951.233e47f3.pasic@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200908003951.233e47f3.pasic@linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:39:51AM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote: > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:39:05 +0200 > Pierre Morel wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture > > to validate VIRTIO device features. > > Michael, is this going in via your tree? I guess so. Still not really happy about second-guessing the hypervisor, but this got acks from others so maybe I'm wrong in this instance. Won't be the first time. -- MST