Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp3769430pxk; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 01:50:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyT9bguL7+Im7TtgSgc8R+4KlYmWhrAEWQb6uUQUja1AhZcV8KxYuXnm0L1NR6BQRikA6Ed X-Received: by 2002:a50:f687:: with SMTP id d7mr26858707edn.353.1599555053046; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 01:50:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599555053; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aq6WiT18HB+RyA8A2KVdtJdqd4Ba61rE9CSyg5DLpiXzEpYNIKxGkaxiTer/eYOKJB 6JGg4opLRoW5fOCuJ/tIOghagYlEy8xRvKLTjKjad1vhbHggNY7K2XtcaSUSZ3cM8Q+P iCH6Hq0OqTSxfXrRAp0pebWfJLmsFk0z6bHiuzJFWqkAKsH+3sBnIEHuP5aE/7ZXrEYf RYGD4r1/wzdGd7rb86AO0UueINAd1Rv3nENOCINbcQ4uleS98l/uunaWdYQESi6ia106 GG8PHquYQzJOinJHGCK+YAJPypLcqULqrus03qyC8qDYUoersGfEo+xITjdzml+uLI2H TVvw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=WIilKc8voJhD6HqanhXRrbRJ65/BRRqTx9fPQ2X84aw=; b=ywTNLVc9X9xUhlAzeiNMJVTanMoO9+y3extrsBMdjol+OFPT8UogldNkgAo3i7OzCk ou5ca7ZtVTMox7v5sfWh9MgLlof/jD2sfzRMQTI/4zljsXa+CZFxY336SfFJ7EDQRcN9 i88OApNkWrnUUNnSJFocl7NHauWqqO11dMAaZT1iRXXr+slC8lxBUVk1plcZCGFEAxvM q7fcOi6vIeDYDEwHHSUkup/lTJmzksNBHthpCHOXEY1VTP1iS+Nc+5cPJfxfcHI638Eh MSx8fpVDv5fbaRo8gyIITMQLeogAc4ZPyPqU5btaWTDXOQfqR85bz7tZ6uPwofg4HhLz ySmA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DtQB0Zi8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u6si4628226ejf.115.2020.09.08.01.50.31; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 01:50:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DtQB0Zi8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729991AbgIHIsV (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 8 Sep 2020 04:48:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44156 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729550AbgIHIsM (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2020 04:48:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x444.google.com (mail-pf1-x444.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::444]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E0A0C061573; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 01:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x444.google.com with SMTP id n14so2452773pff.6; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 01:48:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WIilKc8voJhD6HqanhXRrbRJ65/BRRqTx9fPQ2X84aw=; b=DtQB0Zi8VPGsU9ZAdMtlxkJCMDrklHDXIioGjOdUl/k01/kYRbapRmv7/mCfqa5ZHq LVeMjiDoYdZ0dE1D6kXGHDjnoLw08ELYqOKARUTg60IGXSvToqd4oXCirspt2nlbTdHR 9sl+fjC/1tFjTgZrumKMTja5vQS1+68FA8OauxUgyi4BSDLct91TGdlUpBd+nYY7STqb TnFPEGLvCFUPEdH6dEwJrbkSdHkJdy61xkL5qc/wJqyh89IcLRFdkuIgu1jLDgUFViu5 XCufnUxY0/pMxOOPXa0yKqony8olavXMOYwF5lByif2GrkCu+yQpd/CSotjAY2xrtliX 8meQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WIilKc8voJhD6HqanhXRrbRJ65/BRRqTx9fPQ2X84aw=; b=F4iRLxeEzXyOsNY7GFTD7yU4psZbaHbhrbllZJ8dp6OX5uQaCiRlGqA3lZcViQixkk 4kkvs6ctq/28PDCv5FX2bNZZDmXYsV33mvmXx72Qhk3sfT+M2/4rRt6itdrO+ZPiWYQq sn5Y1DbmsTsKFXpBbTmx291+vY2ZMaojuyStabmGLxO3a3fuJQAi6xfK2iRZkqv7tNGi p6W15zo0OdGVXyhiQmwXIwVhlw3Vc0GOegSozU7xYygYsvEgU90DDDRlKA5nfSewHmPq WGigk7K9KzdOe5ZYBsEPURelmV32ayat/aPRg3zR0UB1HL/6TxMWnL4epbzTHMCd644z QV7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bHUSkQ3GB45eciPFcWG/iLpzsTFSql/U4uOz+lRn3s2eDmzSm chgDP6iHjveXEX571r7/Ma/l6mxGa6a3pXWDP0M= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:28:: with SMTP id 37mr23494899pla.107.1599554892083; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 01:48:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200905133230.1014581-1-j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> <20200905133230.1014581-6-j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> <20200908081445.GC4400@dell> In-Reply-To: <20200908081445.GC4400@dell> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:47:54 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] pwm: ntxec: Add driver for PWM function in Netronix EC To: Lee Jones Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Jonathan_Neusch=C3=A4fer?= , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Thierry Reding , =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Sam Ravnborg , Linus Walleij , Heiko Stuebner , Stephan Gerhold , Lubomir Rintel , Mark Brown , allen , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "David S. Miller" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Heiko Stuebner , Josua Mayer , Andreas Kemnade , Arnd Bergmann , Daniel Palmer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:14 AM Lee Jones wrote: > On Sat, 05 Sep 2020, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Saturday, September 5, 2020, Jonathan Neusch=C3=A4fer > > wrote: ... > > > +config PWM_NTXEC > > > + tristate "Netronix embedded controller PWM support" > > > > > > > > > > > + depends on MFD_NTXEC && OF > > > > > > I don=E2=80=99t see need to reduce test coverage and use of the driver = by sticking > > with OF. Actually it=E2=80=99s not used. > > If the device is only known to boot with OF, then it's pointless > building it when !OF. No, it's not. As I pointed out the (compilation) test coverage is better. > If you want to increase test coverage enable > COMPILE_TEST instead. It is one way to achieve that, yes; depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST depends on MFD_NTXEC --=20 With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko