Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:04:44 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc:     rjw@rjwysocki.net, robh+dt@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, amitk@kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, tdas@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Use regmap for accessing hardware
 registers
Message-ID: <20200908103444.5e526uawa45om6lt@vireshk-i7>
References: <20200908075716.30357-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
 <20200908075716.30357-6-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200908075716.30357-6-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 08-09-20, 13:27, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Use regmap for accessing cpufreq registers in hardware.

Why ? Please mention why a change is required in the log.

> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> index 41853db7c9b8..de816bcafd33 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  
>  #define LUT_MAX_ENTRIES			40U
> @@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data {
>  
>  struct qcom_cpufreq_data {
>  	void __iomem *base;
> +	struct regmap *regmap;
>  	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data;
>  };
>  
> @@ -85,8 +87,11 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
>  	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = data->soc_data;
>  	unsigned long freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
> +	int ret;
>  
> -	writel_relaxed(index, data->base + soc_data->reg_perf_state);
> +	ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, soc_data->reg_perf_state, index);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	if (icc_scaling_enabled)
>  		qcom_cpufreq_set_bw(policy, freq);
> @@ -102,6 +107,7 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
>  	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data;
>  	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>  	unsigned int index;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
>  	if (!policy)
> @@ -110,7 +116,10 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
>  	data = policy->driver_data;
>  	soc_data = data->soc_data;
>  
> -	index = readl_relaxed(data->base + soc_data->reg_perf_state);
> +	ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, soc_data->reg_perf_state, &index);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	index = min(index, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES - 1);
>  
>  	return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
> @@ -123,9 +132,12 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data = data->soc_data;
>  	unsigned int index;
>  	unsigned long freq;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	index = policy->cached_resolved_idx;
> -	writel_relaxed(index, data->base + soc_data->reg_perf_state);
> +	ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, soc_data->reg_perf_state, index);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return 0;
>  
>  	freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
>  	arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
> @@ -171,14 +183,24 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < LUT_MAX_ENTRIES; i++) {
> -		data = readl_relaxed(drv_data->base + soc_data->reg_freq_lut +
> -				      i * soc_data->lut_row_size);
> +		ret = regmap_read(drv_data->regmap, soc_data->reg_freq_lut +
> +				  i * soc_data->lut_row_size, &data);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			kfree(table);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +
>  		src = FIELD_GET(LUT_SRC, data);
>  		lval = FIELD_GET(LUT_L_VAL, data);
>  		core_count = FIELD_GET(LUT_CORE_COUNT, data);
>  
> -		data = readl_relaxed(drv_data->base + soc_data->reg_volt_lut +
> -				      i * soc_data->lut_row_size);
> +		ret = regmap_read(drv_data->regmap, soc_data->reg_volt_lut +
> +				  i * soc_data->lut_row_size, &data);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			kfree(table);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +
>  		volt = FIELD_GET(LUT_VOLT, data) * 1000;
>  
>  		if (src)
> @@ -248,6 +270,13 @@ static void qcom_get_related_cpus(int index, struct cpumask *m)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static struct regmap_config qcom_cpufreq_regmap = {
> +	.reg_bits = 32,
> +	.reg_stride = 4,
> +	.val_bits = 32,
> +	.fast_io = true,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data qcom_soc_data = {
>  	.reg_enable = 0x0,
>  	.reg_freq_lut = 0x110,
> @@ -274,6 +303,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data;
>  	const struct of_device_id *match;
>  	int ret, index;
> +	u32 val;
>  
>  	cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
>  	if (!cpu_dev) {
> @@ -316,9 +346,18 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  
>  	data->soc_data = match->data;
>  	data->base = base;
> +	data->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &qcom_cpufreq_regmap);
> +	if (IS_ERR(data->regmap)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(data->regmap);
> +		goto error;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* HW should be in enabled state to proceed */
> -	if (!(readl_relaxed(base + data->soc_data->reg_enable) & 0x1)) {
> +	ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, data->soc_data->reg_enable, &val);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto error;
> +
> +	if (!(val & 0x1)) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d cpufreq hardware not enabled\n", index);
>  		ret = -ENODEV;
>  		goto error;
> -- 
> 2.17.1

-- 
viresh