Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 7F5BAC433C6
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] ASoC: qcom: Add support for lpass hdmi driver
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
        agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
        broonie@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, plai@codeaurora.org,
        bgoswami@codeaurora.org, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com,
        rohitkr@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     V Sujith Kumar Reddy <vsujithk@codeaurora.org>
References: <1598855964-1042-1-git-send-email-srivasam@codeaurora.org>
 <1598855964-1042-4-git-send-email-srivasam@codeaurora.org>
 <ac1f0b9a-8e07-464c-b0df-6b8e5665a632@linaro.org>
 <0101017458d94c82-96bbcff0-018e-4f5d-8273-7869c3599d32-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
 <b18ed556-09f5-1d2a-b8fc-56a52429addc@linaro.org>
From:   Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@codeaurora.org>
Organization: Qualcomm India Private Limited
Message-ID: <010101746ed032f5-3967f10b-7d55-40ab-a674-63f1ff370565-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 17:42:52 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b18ed556-09f5-1d2a-b8fc-56a52429addc@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Feedback-ID: 1.us-west-2.CZuq2qbDmUIuT3qdvXlRHZZCpfZqZ4GtG9v3VKgRyF0=:AmazonSES
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Thanks for your reply Srinivas!!!

On 9/4/2020 4:54 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>
> On 04/09/2020 12:21, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>>>
>>> Before going into detail review, I see real issue in the overall 
>>> approach here to add new interface to exiting lpass!!
>>>
>>> Intention of struct lpass_variant is to address differences between 
>>> SoCs or different lpass versions. But you should not duplicate this 
>>> and use it for addressing differences between each lpass interfaces!
>>> All the dai related register offsets should still go in to this 
>>> structure and driver should be able to know which dai its talking to 
>>> based on snd_soc_dai_driver id and select correct register offset.
>>>
>> Do You suggest to use separate structure like struct 
>> lpass_hdmi_interface in lpass_data?
>
> No, you should just put every thing lpass_variant as you did but no 
> "id" thing in that.
Okay. will change accordingly.
>
> --srini

-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.,
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.