Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:40:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:40:43 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:27375 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:40:27 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 03:40:58 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Davide Libenzi Cc: lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Proposal For A More Scalable Scheduler ... Message-ID: <20011030034058.B21884@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Davide Libenzi , lkml In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:38:07PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote: > 2) My Linux Scheduler Stuff Page: > http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/lnxsched.html > Anyone know if this is preempt safe? It's using processor specific lists, and might not be. I tried integrating it into my latest kernel, and had some troubles with: 2.4.13freeswan-1.91+ac5+preempt+netdev_random+vm_freeswap I'll admit, it was pretty ambitious trying to get it to work with -ac and preempt at the same time.... When I get some time over the next few days, I'll give it a try with fewer patches to reduce the interactions... Oh, btw, the above kernel patch sets have compiled together, now it's just a matter of rebooting and see if anything breaks. :) Night guys, Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/