Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 8 Sep 2020 20:59:47 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc:     rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        agross@kernel.org, amitk@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org,
        tdas@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add cpufreq support for SM8250 SoC
Message-ID: <20200908152926.GD2352@mani-NUC7i5DNKE>
References: <20200908075716.30357-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
 <20200908075716.30357-7-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
 <20200908152217.GO3715@yoga>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200908152217.GO3715@yoga>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 0908, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 08 Sep 02:57 CDT 2020, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> 
> > SM8250 SoC uses EPSS block for carrying out the cpufreq duties. Hence, add
> > support for it in the driver with relevant of_match data.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > index de816bcafd33..c3c397cc3dc6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > @@ -285,8 +285,17 @@ static const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data qcom_soc_data = {
> >  	.lut_row_size = 32,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data sm8250_soc_data = {
> 
> Could it be that this is the "epss_soc_data" (i.e. not sm8250 specific)?
> (We should still use/include the platform specific compatible though).
> 

Hmm, makes sense. Will change it.

Thanks,
Mani

> Regards,
> Bjorn
> 
> > +	.reg_enable = 0x0,
> > +	.reg_freq_lut = 0x100,
> > +	.reg_volt_lut = 0x200,
> > +	.reg_perf_state = 0x320,
> > +	.lut_row_size = 4,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const struct of_device_id qcom_cpufreq_hw_match[] = {
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,cpufreq-hw", .data = &qcom_soc_data },
> > +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-epss", .data = &sm8250_soc_data },
> >  	{}
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_cpufreq_hw_match);
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> >