Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932134AbWE3C66 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2006 22:58:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932133AbWE3C66 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2006 22:58:58 -0400 Received: from smtp.enter.net ([216.193.128.24]:6419 "EHLO smtp.enter.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932134AbWE3C65 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2006 22:58:57 -0400 From: "D. Hazelton" To: "Jon Smirl" Subject: Re: OpenGL-based framebuffer concepts Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 22:58:48 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: "Jeff Garzik" , "Pavel Machek" , "Dave Airlie" , "Alan Cox" , "Kyle Moffett" , "Manu Abraham" , "linux cbon" , "Helge Hafting" , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060519224056.37429.qmail@web26611.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <447B666F.5080109@garzik.org> <9e4733910605291510i18d80ff3qc7be3b412fc99785@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9e4733910605291510i18d80ff3qc7be3b412fc99785@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605292258.49082.dhazelton@enter.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1972 Lines: 42 On Monday 29 May 2006 22:10, Jon Smirl wrote: > On 5/29/06, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Pavel Machek wrote: > > > These are very reasonable rules... but still, I think we need to move > > > away from vgacon/vesafb. We need proper hardware drivers for our > > > hardware. > > > > I agree we need proper drivers, but moving away from vesafb will be > > tough... moving away from vgacon is likely impossible for many many > > years yet. > > > > Once proper hardware drivers exist, you will still need to support > > booting into a situation where you probably need video before a driver > > can be loaded -- e.g. distro installers. Server owners will likely > > prefer vgacon over a huge video driver they will never use for anything > > but text mode console. > > These are areas that definitely need more discussion and design work > once we can come to some kind of basic agreement on where to start. I > would definitely like to reduce the number of permutations on how > video drivers can be combined to an absolute minimum. For example > vesafb has caused me a number of problems when it is used > simultaneously with other drivers. > > Other areas that can be explored: > 1) Multiple active consoles on multiple video cards > 2) User space console driver > 3) Ownership of video hardware by the logged in user > 4) Using graphics mode to do console for complex Asian languages > 5) Concept of a safe mode console that will work in all environments Not until the framework gets layed, and preferably not unless someone can provide a good reason for taking these steps (besides #1 - that is one I think has potential. A console set aside for, perhaps, little more that keeping a log of error messages.) DRH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/