Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200905133549.24606-1-warthog618@gmail.com> <CAMpxmJUhTp=KHy_MU7feNDvM+A43u0o0Jjfc3SmSSBh98jjdyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200909011625.GB8496@sol>
In-Reply-To: <20200909011625.GB8496@sol>
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:52:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJVuydgi65_hJWyH4nTFMuaTgvWggwyC=s3ZPxAhxEpC9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/20] gpio: cdev: add uAPI v2
To:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 3:16 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:07:49PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 3:36 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> [ snip]
>
> > >
> > >  drivers/gpio/Kconfig        |   29 +-
> > >  drivers/gpio/Makefile       |    2 +-
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 1277 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.h |   15 +
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      |    5 +
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h      |    6 +
> > >  include/uapi/linux/gpio.h   |  317 ++++++++-
> > >  tools/gpio/gpio-event-mon.c |  146 ++--
> > >  tools/gpio/gpio-hammer.c    |   56 +-
> > >  tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c     |  176 ++++-
> > >  tools/gpio/gpio-utils.h     |   48 +-
> > >  tools/gpio/gpio-watch.c     |   16 +-
> > >  tools/gpio/lsgpio.c         |   60 +-
> > >  13 files changed, 1948 insertions(+), 205 deletions(-)
> > >
> > >
> > > base-commit: feeaefd378cae2f6840f879d6123ef265f8aee79
> > > --
> > > 2.28.0
> > >
> >
> > To me this looks good enough to queue for v5.10. I think you'll need
> > to resend the selftests patches and get an ack from selftests
> > maintainer. Once that's done we can get this series into next.
> >
>
> I can hardly resend what has never been sent ;-).
>
> This series is complete without the selftest changes.  Once this is in tree
> somewhere, so I have something to base them on, I'll bounce them off
> Shuah.
>

Oops, sorry I got confused by Shuah's mail.

Bartosz