Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp476673pxk; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:08:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxevMibqhq0z2gjG8/OCLl5e+9vXFpNBAXoskC/dpJoVHrPGw/0eflVIGSj9G9bZ2eyfQRS X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fb8f:: with SMTP id lr15mr4546177ejb.25.1599671322003; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:08:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599671321; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=on0QOuMUj+pIsbqkFVRHa9kUZ2G/WcUnzEZ0GxBXXUdbacY+H6yolJZqdXB3MXgG/A nABNKHBXXw9fBuFlIpkRTslVJKzsJDxDZi8gyljpT5LgM8q+5gMS4d3dZ6Os7jq5tiFt x8CMtyz04UPknS2oVY/zUUlP2TKaXMqkQ4fWGk698QNQwEzIJPJUjIJ7wsDrQ4Dl+DFk 28u7VKg9L09Tx1mEl6I6CrDRv3Vfe1KMZ3mYGKKgsl85IRhhJBfB3vIHVTC6a3+aGA5q UYBnMo8vuMwxwFSY84VUNAX0kamOLb9MRJVJdR4CelAoi/jXBY3Tq7K3vEctHmtgTdfX Cp+w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=krZf25HoLYNOs+89jtLjxVuIVVFDL/DS0/iONN95wCA=; b=JoVlOSRNN8e1kXeZzOQJSX8n6CBKznlw/YVhu4LRZ/LttQUkIuu+pzlBAInKZWlBUW YAvteyqJWHaNdXlm3a4P3kMEKtT5I0+FarP3q/EmAydddfoJ0kVGLotUUfgy4+uXRJ3J IIJ+r1UXBAXxahT2t+YEiHLHFX8v6jz6iSRtdhYeVVrNn2s5QeWaaI37HNV7//3UwxA/ F2BS1CWIdJV5rQ7Nl+V63v3fwax5epfU8cR0iPXFLjFkdab+PMFDcL/AaMuOPEy8cvIm gDeoXyh4nT0cPOEU3jNkjZagkrHylwp0fMVCVASCUsB2KdsrHLQjSMXRlhsWwt9HST0K dzqQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=OL93yWh7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d6si1865309ejj.92.2020.09.09.10.08.16; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=OL93yWh7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730493AbgIIRHj (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:07:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48392 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730397AbgIIPhU (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:37:20 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x242.google.com (mail-oi1-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::242]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C709C0619C3 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x242.google.com with SMTP id 185so2677017oie.11 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 08:13:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=krZf25HoLYNOs+89jtLjxVuIVVFDL/DS0/iONN95wCA=; b=OL93yWh7YYd3Kjpp++lmqusu98KBOYAUlFtscMPkxq3j+FlurgE872aMXM+jYrZLfA slVo0YeMasFlKvpatP/yG3NYkdN7G9zeOdYYDSr/jO1YA4PDmwsY3l3/g2a+UUUUk0sh N/9n/d0axxncRngDQDQ73AzQCMoaR1Qi3RTeH2s7jWwOLkvp7DY3rFzAbiSaUOkyiI0j GbFHlK7xl53jSwXJVpwDyLq1COKTawKzlznu/fwxR2F5MYpx+55Ea2pfphDixt40qy/O 4WUi+T1ptbN4Z8SKmtiSt+QhKD3pGAaSGq2pBDoVmB67cUexujsDH5uHp7kmk03dwp6Y 27qA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=krZf25HoLYNOs+89jtLjxVuIVVFDL/DS0/iONN95wCA=; b=lVTAgjnXdmfry+FPAUiXnNw0dpyaJSL6BCOeIYYU1TKstQ9bmTfEKA9G/bMrhjnnwI 5Cb86d1CxTu221jqkzkhnKlakKfTjnjq+krSaWovUbVBdHRb73d/dVP/BnHEXNRQ2H0W xJKLfqgMolJjiBZQuBrshhbYRbNFB5OART19AHR34598nAXpKcUV95zRd8ePFGSUo9A/ ueQOzH/YBEs5WqPkAlbsw8UXCf56weLmLefQB/FDMH5FjgsBCOFontjxJf3/nRx7BdKg kinUsWsfV7Ka6UyYlue4cd6nnUsBljc7+cM1Pw7oOTbMwo2JiO0PupltmWYM3otStTPX IFyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532E6sYPmZqMUzpuGtZ/nH5UpbU2YBY8/z2FAa8/ZRppUfFZ+sXZ wtJ8fZoiZi+I6RiQFOwDCH6lshfcTnZezl4wA1Ca8A== X-Received: by 2002:aca:5158:: with SMTP id f85mr992820oib.121.1599664437260; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 08:13:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200907134055.2878499-1-elver@google.com> <20200907134055.2878499-4-elver@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20200907134055.2878499-4-elver@google.com> From: Marco Elver Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 17:13:45 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 03/10] arm64, kfence: enable KFENCE for ARM64 To: Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , Linux ARM Cc: Alexander Potapenko , Christoph Lameter , Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Paul E. McKenney" , Andrey Konovalov , Andrey Ryabinin , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Dmitry Vyukov , Eric Dumazet , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Peter Zijlstra , Qian Cai , Thomas Gleixner , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , LKML , kasan-dev , Linux Memory Management List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello arm64 maintainers, On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 15:41, Marco Elver wrote: > Add architecture specific implementation details for KFENCE and enable > KFENCE for the arm64 architecture. In particular, this implements the > required interface in . Currently, the arm64 version does > not yet use a statically allocated memory pool, at the cost of a pointer > load for each is_kfence_address(). > For ARM64, we would like to solicit feedback on what the best option is > to obtain a constant address for __kfence_pool. One option is to declare > a memory range in the memory layout to be dedicated to KFENCE (like is > done for KASAN), however, it is unclear if this is the best available > option. We would like to avoid touching the memory layout. We can't yet tell what the best option for this might be. So, any suggestions on how to go about switching to a static pool would be much appreciated. Many thanks, -- Marco